Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ethical issues in radiation protection

K Shrader-Frechette1, L Persson

  • 1Environmental Sciences and Policy Program and Philosophy Department, University of South Florida, Tampa 33620-5550, USA.

Health Physics
|August 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Monte Carlo method for calculation of the characteristic limits decision threshold and detection limit in low-level radioactivity measurements.

Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine·2021
Same author

Calculation of decision threshold and detection limit in radiometric measurements using a Monte Carlo Method.

Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine·2019
Same author

Prevalence and Pathogenicity of Foot and Root Rot Pathogens of Pea in Southern Scandinavia.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

Infection of Potatoes by Oospores of Phytophthora infestans in Soil.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

Assessment of Soil Suppressiveness to Aphanomyces Root Rot of Pea.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

Root Rot of Pea and Faba Bean in Southern Sweden Caused by Phytophthora pisi sp. nov.

Plant disease·2019
Same journal

Assessment of Health Risks of Adults and Children Due to Consumption of Uranium in Groundwater from Chengalpattu District, Tamil Nadu, India.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Radiation Protection Abstracts, Volume 46, Number 1.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Specialized Radiological Assets for Navigable Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Virtual and Augmented Reality.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

DoseBusters: A Fully Immersive Virtual Reality Game for Radiation Protection and Detection.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Radioactivity in Bottled Drinking Water from Greater Dhaka City and Concomitant Ingestion Doses to Consumers.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Assessment of Radiation Dose and Protection Practices in Neonatal Radiography in NICUs.

Health physics·2026
See all related articles

This study examines international radiation protection guidelines, exploring five core ethical dilemmas in risk management. It contrasts key ethical stances to inform radiation protection policies.

Area of Science:

  • Radiation Protection Science
  • Bioethics
  • Risk Management

Background:

  • International radiation protection recommendations from ICRP, IAEA, and ILO are surveyed.
  • Previous research on radiation protection ethics and risk assessment is outlined.
  • Ethical considerations in radiation protection are increasingly important.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review ethical thinking on five key issues in radiation protection.
  • To formulate these issues in terms of alternative ethical stances.
  • To provide a framework for ethical decision-making in radiation protection.

Main Methods:

  • Survey of existing international radiation-protection recommendations.
  • Review of ethical literature on radiation protection and risk assessment.
Keywords:
Health Care and Public HealthInternational Atomic Energy AgencyInternational Commission on Radiological ProtectionInternational Labor Organization

Related Experiment Videos

  • Formulation of five key ethical issues as dichotomous stances.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified five core ethical dilemmas: Equity vs. Efficiency, Health vs. Economics, Individual Rights vs. Societal Benefits, Due Process vs. Necessary Sacrifice, and Stakeholder Consent vs. Management Decisions.
    • Presented alternative ethical stances for each dilemma.
    • Highlighted the complexity of balancing competing ethical considerations.

    Conclusions:

    • Ethical frameworks are crucial for effective radiation protection.
    • Addressing these five dilemmas is essential for robust risk management.
    • The study provides a foundation for further ethical analysis and policy development in radiation protection.