Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Asymmetric Walkway: A Novel Behavioral Assay for Studying Asymmetric Locomotion
Published on: January 15, 2016
Type II errors in comparisons of dextral and sinistral groups
1Department of Psychology, Augusta State University, GA 30910, USA.
Abstract:
Anomalous cerebral dominance can have multiple manifestations, e.g., left-eye preference or left-foot preference in the absence of left handedness per se. The 1987 estimate of prevalence of anomalous dominance in the population by Geschwind and Behan approaches 30%, three times the estimate obtained by using handedness alone as the sorting criterion. Accordingly, substantial numbers of subjects assigned to "dextral" groups may actually display other legitimate indicators of anomalous dominance. As such there is a tendency to commit Type II errors in studies in which handedness alone is used to represent the variance attributed to cerebral dominance. Accordingly, null hypotheses assessing the relations of cerebral dominance with dependent variables are accepted even though they may, in fact, be false.
Related Concept Videos
Errors In Hypothesis Tests
Bonferroni Test
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...

