Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

An algorithm for assessing intraoperative mean arterial pressure lability

D L Reich1, T K Osinski, C Bodian

  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA. dreich@smtplink.mssm.edu

Anesthesiology
|July 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dipole Strength Distribution of ^{8}He and Decay Characteristics.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Intrinsically chiral exciton polaritons in an atomically-thin semiconductor.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Nuclear structure opportunities with GeV radioactive beams at FAIR.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2024
Same author

Electromagnetic properties of nuclei from first principles: a case for synergies between experiment and theory.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2024
Same author

Structural studies of calcium silicate hydrate modified with heavy metal cations.

Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy·2024
Same author

Effect of compaction on bisulfide diffusive transport through MX-80 bentonite.

Journal of contaminant hydrology·2024
Same journal

The Time-out.

Anesthesiology·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of Post-block Hypersensitivity Using Quantitative Sensory Testing Before, During, and After Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Resolution in Healthy Volunteers.

Anesthesiology·2026
Same journal

The state of medical education research in Anesthesiology: Current landscape and future directions - An initiative of the Anesthesia Research Council.

Anesthesiology·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic Ultrasound-guided Focused Ultrasound-induced Noninvasive, Reversible Peripheral Nerve Blockade in an In Vivo Model of Acute Pain: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Anesthesiology·2026
Same journal

S-Ketamine Reduces Risk of Postoperative Delirium: Comment.

Anesthesiology·2026
Same journal

Computed Tomography-Based Body Composition Assessment for Preoperative Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Anesthesiology·2026
See all related articles

This study developed a computer algorithm to accurately measure blood pressure lability during surgery. The new method provides a precise tool for assessing anesthesia practice and patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology
  • Medical Informatics
  • Clinical Data Analysis

Background:

  • Intraoperative blood pressure lability is linked to adverse outcomes but was previously hard to measure accurately.
  • Limited data collection methods in prior studies hindered precise assessment of blood pressure changes.
  • Computerized systems offer enhanced data for studying blood pressure lability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate an expert system algorithm for quantifying intraoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP) lability.
  • To improve the precision and data richness in measuring blood pressure fluctuations during anesthesia.
  • To create a reliable tool for assessing MAP variability.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 239 computerized anesthesia records.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Optimization of a computer algorithm measuring median MAP changes in 2-min epochs.
  • Validation of the algorithm on 229 additional anesthesia records after expert anesthesiologist ratings.

    • Main Results:

    • The algorithm's measure of fractional MAP change correlated strongly with anesthesiologists' lability ratings (r=0.78).
    • Optimal sensitivity and specificity for detecting MAP lability were 98% and 59%, respectively.
    • The algorithm effectively quantifies blood pressure lability.

    Conclusions:

    • Expert systems, like this algorithm, can enhance anesthesia practice through "smart alarms" for blood pressure lability.
    • This validated algorithm offers a superior tool for investigating the relationship between blood pressure lability and patient outcomes.
    • The developed system improves the assessment of intraoperative hemodynamic stability.