Related Experiment Videos

Perineural tumor extension along the trigeminal nerve: magnetic resonance imaging findings

C B Majoie1, F J Hulsmans, B Verbeeten

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Abstract

Insights

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with fat-suppression best visualizes trigeminal nerve tumors. This imaging technique significantly impacts patient management for head and neck cancers with perineural extension.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Oncology
  • Neurology

Background:

  • Perineural tumor extension along the trigeminal nerve is a challenging diagnosis.
  • Accurate imaging is crucial for patient management in head and neck malignancies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients with trigeminal nerve perineural tumor extension.
  • To correlate MRI findings with clinical data for improved diagnosis and management.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 15 patients with trigeminal nerve perineural tumor extension.
  • Comparison of conventional T1-weighted spin echo (T1-WSE) MRI with fat-suppression versus non-fat-suppressed sequences.
  • Assessment of tumor conspicuity and extent by two independent observers.

Main Results:

  • Contrast-enhanced T1-WSE MRI with fat-suppression provided the best visualization of tumors.
  • Conventional T1-WSE MRI was diagnostic in 11 patients, but fat-suppressed images improved visualization in 4.
  • The mandibular division (V3) was most commonly involved, impacting surgical and radiation therapy planning.

Conclusions:

  • Complete trigeminal nerve imaging is recommended for head and neck malignancies at high risk for perineural extension.
  • Thin-section axial and coronal precontrast T1-WSE and postcontrast T1-WSE with fat-suppression MRI sequences are advised.
  • Non-fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-WSE sequences can be used if fat-suppressed images are degraded by artifacts.

Related Concept Videos