Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pitfalls in epidemiological analysis

G Carlsson1

  • 1Department of Sociology, University of Stockholm.

Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine
|June 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Relative risk measures in epidemiology can exaggerate associations and are unreliable for comparisons. Researchers should report population risk and category sizes, and be cautious of measurement errors in confounders, which can create spurious effects even in large samples.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A phase I/II study of arfolitixorin and 5-fluorouracil in combination with oxaliplatin (plus or minus bevacizumab) or irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer.

ESMO open·2022
Same author

A scoping review of public building accessibility.

Disability and health journal·2021
Same author

Effects of applying a standardized assessment and evaluation protocol in housing adaptation implementation - results from a quasi-experimental study.

BMC public health·2019
Same author

AGXT and ERCC2 polymorphisms are associated with clinical outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with 5-FU/oxaliplatin.

The pharmacogenomics journal·2015
Same author

Enabling sense-making for patients receiving outpatient palliative treatment: A participatory action research driven model for person-centered communication.

Palliative & supportive care·2015
Same author

Daily life consequences, cognitive impairment, and fatigue after transient ischemic attack.

Acta neurologica Scandinavica·2015
Same journal

Risk factors of cerebral palsy.

Scandinavian journal of social medicine·1998
Same journal

Tobacco consumption and national rates of personal violence (suicide and homicide)

Scandinavian journal of social medicine·1998
Same journal

Trends in smoking prevalence in Danish adults, 1964-1994. The influence of gender, age, and education.

Scandinavian journal of social medicine·1998
Same journal

Social differences in health in an affluent Danish county.

Scandinavian journal of social medicine·1998
Same journal

Socioeconomic correlates of infant mortality in Hong Kong, 1979-93.

Scandinavian journal of social medicine·1998
Same journal

Socioeconomic differences in health indices, social networks and mortality among Swedish men. A study of men born in 1933.

Scandinavian journal of social medicine·1998
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Relative risk is a commonly used index in epidemiological studies for assessing disease risk.
  • Despite its intuitive appeal, relative risk can overestimate the strength of associations and is problematic for comparative analyses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the limitations of relative risk as a sole measure of association.
  • To emphasize the potential for measurement errors in confounders to produce misleading results.
  • To caution against over-reliance on multivariate techniques without addressing data quality.

Main Methods:

  • Derivation of relative risks from a normal correlation surface.
  • Simulation experiment with realistic numerical assumptions and error contamination.
  • Analysis of potential impact of measurement errors in confounding variables.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Relative risk can present an exaggerated impression of association strength, even with low underlying correlation.
  • Measurement errors in confounding variables can lead to spurious independent effects.
  • Simulation results demonstrate that moderate error contamination produces significant spurious effects, independent of sample size.

Conclusions:

  • Relative risk should be interpreted with caution, and underlying population risk and category sizes should be reported.
  • Multivariate techniques may provide a false sense of security if measurement errors in confounders are not addressed.
  • Measurement errors in confounders are a significant source of error and conflicting results in epidemiological studies, including meta-analyses.