Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bayesian analysis for a single 2 x 2 table

L Hashemi1, B Nandram, R Goldberg

  • 1Liberty Mutual Research Center for Safety and Health, Hopkinton, MA 01748, USA.

Statistics in Medicine
|June 30, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How health-related quality of life assessment should be used in advanced colorectal cancer clinical trials.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2017
Same author

Electroporation-mediated delivery of the FER gene in the resolution of trauma-related fatal pneumonia.

Gene therapy·2016
Same author

A Comprehensive Preseason Fitness Evaluation for Professional Baseball Players.

The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
Same author

Seasonal recurrence of food bolus obstruction in eosinophilic esophagitis.

Internal medicine journal·2015
Same author

Hospital discharge instructions: comprehension and compliance among older adults.

Journal of general internal medicine·2014
Same author

Diabetes autoantibodies do not predict progression to diabetes in adults: the Diabetes Prevention Program.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2014
Same journal

Checking Genetic Homogeneity Between Two Samples Using Summary Statistics With Application to Mendelian Randomization.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Bayesian Learning Model for Joint Risk Prediction of Alcohol and Cannabis Use Disorders.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Reluctant Transfer Learning in Penalized Regressions for Individualized Treatment Rules Under Effect Heterogeneity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Predictor-Assisted Nonparametric Graphical Models With Multivariate Error-Prone Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimizing Treatment Decision Estimation for Right-Censored Survival Data Through Parameter Transfer Learning.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Latent Class Log-Linear Models for Estimating Diagnostic Test Accuracy Without a Gold Standard: A Simulation Study.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces Bayesian methods for comparing two binomial populations, offering exact and approximate analyses for relative risk and odds ratios. Findings from the Worcester Heart Attack Study indicate no significant gender differences in acute myocardial infarction treatment.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Bayesian Inference

Background:

  • Comparing two binomial populations is crucial in epidemiology, especially for small domains where exact methods are limited.
  • Existing methods often lack exactness for small sample sizes, necessitating advanced statistical approaches.
  • Bayesian inference provides a robust framework for analyzing proportions when prior information is available.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and apply Bayesian methods for comparing two binomial populations, focusing on measures like relative risk, odds ratio, and attributable risk.
  • To provide exact and approximate highest density regions for these epidemiological measures.
  • To utilize the Bayes factor for model comparison, specifically testing for common versus distinct proportions.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed Bayesian inference with independent conjugate beta distributions to model population proportions.
  • Developed exact and approximate highest density regions for relative risk, odds ratio, and attributable risk.
  • Utilized the Bayes factor to compare models with common versus distinct proportions.

Main Results:

  • The developed Bayesian methodology was applied to the Worcester Heart Attack Study data.
  • Analysis focused on gender differences in the management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
  • Bayes factor and interval estimates indicated no substantial pharmacologic management differences between genders for AMI patients.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed Bayesian approach offers a flexible and accurate method for comparing binomial populations, particularly useful in epidemiological studies.
  • The study demonstrates the utility of Bayesian inference for quantifying uncertainty in epidemiological measures.
  • Findings suggest similar therapeutic management strategies for male and female patients hospitalized with AMI, based on the analyzed data.