Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Current concepts in oromandibular reconstruction

B B Burkey1, J R Coleman

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2559, USA.

Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America
|August 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

It is not just IMRT: Human papillomavirus related oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma is associated with better swallowing outcomes after definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Oral oncology·2015
Same author

Demonstration of C3-photosynthesis in a bluegreen alga, Coccochloris peniocystis.

Planta·2013
Same author

Fine structural changes associated with the onset of calcium, sodium and water transport by the chick chorioallantoic membrane.

The Journal of membrane biology·2013
Same author

Locating, quantifying and characterising radiation hazards in contaminated nuclear facilities using a novel passive non-electrical polymer based radiation imaging device.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2012
Same author

Differential sound-evoked metabolic activity in fetal tectum grafted into damaged adult rat inferior colliculus.

Restorative neurology and neuroscience·2011
Same author

Microsatellite mutations in buccal cells are associated with aging and head and neck carcinoma.

British journal of cancer·2008
Same journal

Obesity and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Impact on Medical and Surgical Management.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Little Tube; Big Problems: Eustachian Tube Dysfunction.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Current State of Button Battery Ingestion Injuries.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic Algorithm for Eustachian Tube Dysfunction and Indications for Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Patulous Eustachian Tube Dysfunction.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Revisiting Eustachian Tube Anatomy and Physiology.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

This review covers common oromandibular reconstruction methods, combining new free tissue transfer techniques with established approaches for head and neck surgery. It offers guidance for surgeons on reliable reconstructive options.

Area of Science:

  • Head and Neck Surgery
  • Reconstructive Surgery
  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Background:

  • Oromandibular reconstruction is a rapidly advancing field in head and neck surgery.
  • Free tissue transfer techniques have significantly improved reconstructive capabilities.
  • A variety of reconstructive options are available for the oromandibular region.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review common and reliable methods for oromandibular reconstruction.
  • To examine the anatomic basis of each reconstructive option.
  • To provide evidence-based recommendations for surgical practice.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of established and novel reconstructive techniques.
  • Analysis of the anatomical considerations for each method.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Synthesis of clinical experience and published data.

    • Main Results:

    • Detailed examination of various oromandibular reconstruction techniques.
    • Highlighting the strengths and limitations of each approach based on literature.
    • Identification of best practices and recommendations for specific clinical scenarios.

    Conclusions:

    • A combination of modern and traditional techniques offers versatile solutions for oromandibular defects.
    • Understanding anatomical principles is crucial for successful reconstruction.
    • Surgeons can optimize outcomes by selecting appropriate techniques based on patient-specific factors and available evidence.