Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Confidence intervals for the generalized ROC criterion

B Reiser1, D Faraggi

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Haifa, Israel.

Biometrics
|June 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Hemoptysis and acute kidney injury in COVID-19].

Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin·2020
Same author

Gold nanorods with conjugated polymer ligands: sintering-free conductive inks for printed electronics.

Chemical science·2018
Same author

Multivalent bonds in self-assembled bundles of ultrathin gold nanowires.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2016
Same author

Diabetes, but not the metabolic syndrome, predicts the severity and extent of coronary artery disease in women.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2007
Same author

Heart rate variability (HRV) of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) during the post-insult sub-acute period.

Brain injury·2005
Same author

Microglial stability and repopulation in the retina.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2005
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces the generalized ROC criterion for evaluating combined diagnostic markers. We provide confidence intervals and approximations for estimating this criterion, enhancing diagnostic marker assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves are vital for evaluating diagnostic marker performance.
  • Combining multiple markers can improve diagnostic accuracy.
  • The generalized ROC criterion measures the maximal area under the ROC curve for optimal marker combinations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide confidence intervals for the generalized ROC criterion.
  • To derive and evaluate an approximation for the generalized ROC criterion with heterogeneous covariance matrices.
  • To illustrate the application of these methods with an example.

Main Methods:

  • Statistical estimation of confidence intervals for the generalized ROC criterion.
  • Derivation of an approximation for heterogeneous covariance matrices.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Simulation studies to evaluate the approximation's performance.

    • Main Results:

    • Confidence intervals for the generalized ROC criterion were established under homogeneous covariance matrices.
    • An approximation for the generalized ROC criterion was derived and evaluated for heterogeneous covariance matrices.
    • The simulation study demonstrated the utility of the derived approximation.

    Conclusions:

    • The study provides essential statistical tools for assessing combined diagnostic markers.
    • The developed methods enhance the evaluation of diagnostic marker utility.
    • The findings are applicable to various fields utilizing diagnostic marker combinations.