Related Experiment Videos
Sulfinpyrazone and postoperative deep vein thrombosis
Summary
Sulfinpyrazone did not effectively prevent deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing surgery. Subcutaneous heparin was significantly more effective than sulfinpyrazone in reducing deep vein thrombosis incidence.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Pulmonary embolism is a risk after general surgery.
- Subcutaneous heparin and dextran infusions reduce embolism risk but have drawbacks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effectiveness of sulfinpyrazone in preventing deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
- To compare sulfinpyrazone with heparin and dextran for DVT prophylaxis.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study of 119 patients undergoing elective general or urological surgery.
- Patients received prophylactic sulfinpyrazone, subcutaneous heparin, or dextran-70.
- The 125I-fibrinogen test was used to diagnose DVT.
Main Results:
- Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) incidence was 43% with sulfinpyrazone, 31% with dextran-70, and 9% with heparin.
- The difference in DVT rates between sulfinpyrazone and heparin was statistically significant (p < 0.01).
Conclusions:
- Sulfinpyrazone, at the dose tested, was not effective in preventing DVT during elective general surgery.
- Subcutaneous heparin demonstrated superior efficacy in DVT prophylaxis compared to sulfinpyrazone.