Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Judging Relative Importance: Direct Rating and Point Allocation Are Not Equivalent

Doyle1, Green, Bottomley

  • 1University of Bath

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
|April 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

Directly rating attributes versus allocating points yields different decision weights. Both methods show bias, as predicted by an idealized weighting model.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Death from Old Age.

Iowa medical journal·2023
Same author

The Case of a Lacerated Wound Which Penetrated the Thorax, from Which the Patient Recovered.

The Medical and physical journal·2018
Same author

Two Cases of Sloughing Ulceration, in Which Nitric Acid Was the Principal Local Application.

The London medical and physical journal·2018
Same author

Case of Strangulated Ventral Hernia, with Successful Operation.

The London medical and physical journal·2018
Same author

Case of Strangulated Femoral Hernia in the Male, Requiring Operation.

The London medical and physical journal·2018
Same author

Extravasation of Urine Followed by Extensive Sloughing of the Scrotum, Exposing Both the Testicles, Attended with Severe Constitutional Symptoms, and Terminating Fatally.

The London medical and physical journal·2018

Area of Science:

  • Decision Science
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Understanding how individuals perceive attribute importance is crucial for decision-making.
  • Common methods include direct rating and point allocation for assigning decision weights.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare decision weights derived from direct rating versus point allocation methods.
  • To investigate elicitation-dependent biases in these weighting procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Participants directly rated the importance of attributes.
  • Participants allocated a fixed budget of points to attributes (Point Allocation - PA).
  • Comparison of decision weight profiles generated by both methods.

Main Results:

  • Direct rating and point allocation produced significantly different decision weight profiles.
  • Both methods exhibited consistent, elicitation-dependent biases.
  • Observed differences align with predictions from an idealized weighting model.

Conclusions:

  • The method used to elicit decision weights significantly impacts perceived attribute importance.
  • Awareness of elicitation-dependent bias is critical for accurate decision analysis.
  • An idealized model effectively predicts biases in weighting procedures.

Related Experiment Videos