Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bioethics for clinicians: 13. Resource allocation

M F McKneally1, B M Dickens, E M Meslin

  • 1Toronto Hospital, Ont. martin.mckneally@utoronto.ca

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal = Journal De L'Association Medicale Canadienne
|July 15, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The "living will": legal background and effects.

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2011
Same author

Clinical ethicists' perspectives on organisational ethics in healthcare organisations.

Journal of medical ethics·2008
Same author

Achieving transparency in implementing abortion laws.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics·2007
Same author

Applying genomics-related technologies for Africa's health needs.

African journal of medicine and medical sciences·2007
Same author

Respecting adolescents' confidentiality and reproductive and sexual choices.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics·2007
Same author

Reproductive health and public health ethics.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics·2007
Same journal

Association between sedative prescriptions after hospital discharge and falls and other adverse events in older adults: a population-based cohort study.

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne·2026
Same journal

The path to securing a resource-intensive physician job in Canada: lived experiences of decision-makers and trainees.

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne·2026
Same journal

A socioecological framework for physician advocacy: motivators, enablers, and barriers.

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne·2026
See all related articles

Resource allocation in healthcare presents ethical challenges. Clinicians must balance patient needs and benefits, guided by justice principles and professional duties, to ensure fair and transparent decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Health Policy
  • Distributive Justice

Background:

  • Healthcare resource allocation involves complex ethical and practical dilemmas for clinicians.
  • Aristotelian distributive justice suggests unequal allocation is permissible based on morally relevant factors like need or benefit.
  • Balancing a physician's fiduciary duty against broader societal interests in resource allocation is a contentious issue.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the ethical considerations and practical challenges in healthcare resource allocation.
  • To examine the role of distributive justice principles in prioritizing patients for scarce resources.
  • To discuss the balance between physician duty to patients and societal interests in healthcare rationing.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of ethical frameworks, specifically Aristotelian distributive justice.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of legal precedents and professional expectations regarding physician allegiance.
  • Examination of criteria for resource allocation, distinguishing between relevant and irrelevant factors.

    • Main Results:

    • Determining patient priority based on need or benefit can be challenging even with ethical guidelines.
    • Physicians' duty to patients is expected by courts, irrespective of financial constraints.
    • Allocation based on non-clinical factors (e.g., religion, sexual orientation) is legally and ethically prohibited.

    Conclusions:

    • Clear, fair, and publicly accepted policies are essential for transparent and defensible healthcare resource allocation.
    • Ethical frameworks and professional duties must guide decisions to navigate allocation dilemmas.
    • Resource allocation decisions require careful consideration of both individual patient claims and societal implications.