Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Developing clinically valid practice guidelines

J Grimshaw1, M Eccles, I Russell

  • 1Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, UK.

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
|September 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Abstracts of presentations to the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Canadian Association of General Surgeons Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons: Canadian Surgery Forum, Toronto, Ont., September 6-9, 2007.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2023
Same author

Canadian Surgery Forum.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2022
Same author

Medical Titles.

The Hospital·2018
Same author

Acute hand injury splinting - the good, the bad and the ugly.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2017
Same author

The isolated forearm technique in non-paralysed patients.

Anaesthesia·2016
Same author

Protocol for the development of a CONSORT-equity guideline to improve reporting of health equity in randomized trials.

Implementation science : IS·2015
Same journal

Evaluating Restraint and Seclusion as Care Processes Rather Than Compliance Metrics.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Burden in Informal Caregivers of Palliative Care Patients With Pressure Injuries: Perceived Social Support and Influencing Factors Care Burden in Palliative Caregivers.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Organisational Problems, Role Stress, and Job Satisfaction Among Emergency Department Workers: A Multicenter Mixed-Effects Study.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Highlighting a Systemic Bias in the Responder Odds Ratio.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Epistemological Issues in Clinical Reasoning: A Scoping Review.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

An Evaluation of AI-Generated Clinical Notes in the OpenNotes Era: A Thematic Analysis of Clinician Discourse.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
See all related articles

Developing valid clinical practice guidelines requires systematic reviews and evidence-based recommendations. Investing in these rigorous processes improves patient outcomes and clinical practice, despite resource demands.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Practice Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Healthcare Policy

Background:

  • Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are crucial for improving patient outcomes and standardizing care.
  • The validity and implementation of CPGs depend heavily on their development process.
  • Current challenges include ensuring CPGs are evidence-based and practically applicable.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the practical implications of developing valid, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.
  • To highlight the role of systematic reviews and multidisciplinary panels in guideline development.
  • To identify research priorities for enhancing guideline validity and implementation.

Main Methods:

  • The paper reviews established methodologies for developing high-quality clinical practice guidelines.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It emphasizes the importance of systematic literature reviews and explicit links between evidence and recommendations.
  • The role of national/regional guideline development groups and peer review is discussed.

    • Main Results:

    • Guidelines developed using systematic reviews and explicit evidence links are more likely to be valid.
    • Successful development requires good leadership, technical support, and expertise in translating evidence.
    • Peer review of guidelines is an important component for ensuring validity.

    Conclusions:

    • Investing in evidence-based guideline development yields significant returns through improved clinical practice and patient outcomes.
    • Guideline developers need enhanced expertise in systematic review processes and evidence translation.
    • Further research is needed to optimize the development and implementation of clinically valid guidelines.