Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Detecting poor design, erroneous analysis and misinterpretation of studies

D R Appleton1

  • 1Department of Medical Statistics, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
|November 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Identifying poor research requires understanding common flaws. This study presents examples of bad study design, analysis, and interpretation to help detect research misconduct.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Streptomyces sanglieri which colonised and enhanced the growth of Elaeis guineensis Jacq. seedlings was antagonistic to Ganoderma boninense in in vitro studies.

Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology·2016
Same author

Rapid identification of cyclic tetrapyrrolic photosensitisers for photodynamic therapy using on-line hyphenated LC-PDA-MS coupled with photo-cytotoxicity assay.

Phytochemical analysis : PCA·2011
Same author

Sugars consumption by 379 11-12-year-old English children in 1990 compared with results in 1980.

Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association·2007
Same author

Simulation of cell proliferation in mouse oral epithelium, and the action of epidermal growth factor: evidence for a high degree of synchronization of the stem cells.

Cell proliferation·2002
Same author

In vitro labelling studies and the measurement of epithelial cell proliferative activity in the human oral cavity.

Archives of oral biology·2001
Same author

Using an antedependence test to analyse post-operative pain measurements.

Statistics in medicine·2000

Area of Science:

  • Scientific integrity
  • Research methodology

Background:

  • Detecting fraudulent or poor-quality research is crucial for scientific advancement.
  • Understanding common pitfalls in research is essential for reviewers and readers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline key indicators of flawed research.
  • To provide examples of poor study design, inappropriate analyses, and interpretation errors.

Main Methods:

  • Review and compilation of common errors in scientific literature.
  • Categorization of research deficiencies into design, analysis, and interpretation.

Main Results:

  • Identified common issues in study design, such as lack of controls or inadequate sample sizes.
  • Highlighted inappropriate statistical analyses and misinterpretation of results as frequent problems.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Presented specific examples illustrating these research flaws.

    • Conclusions:

    • Awareness of common research errors aids in identifying and preventing the dissemination of unreliable findings.
    • Educating researchers and reviewers on these pitfalls can improve overall research quality.