Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2026

Guidelines for Elective Pediatric Fiberoptic Intubation
Published on: January 17, 2011
Does thiopentone delay recovery in children premedicated with midazolam?
P Morley-Forster1, J D McAllister, H Vandenberghe
1Department of Anesthesia, St. Joseph's Health Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Insights
For pediatric surgical patients premedicated with midazolam, intravenous thiopentone induction slightly prolongs anesthesia emergence compared to halothane inhalation induction. This impacts postoperative recovery times in children.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology
- Pediatric Surgery
Background:
- Midazolam premedication is common in pediatric surgical outpatients.
- Anesthesia induction methods can influence postoperative recovery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of intravenous thiopentone versus halothane inhalation induction on anesthesia emergence in pediatric surgical outpatients.
- To evaluate postoperative recovery in children premedicated with midazolam.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, randomized trial involving 100 children (1-10 years) undergoing ENT surgery.
- Patients received midazolam and atropine, then randomized to halothane or thiopentone induction.
- Standardized anesthetic protocol followed, with extubation time and sedation assessed.
Main Results:
- Thiopentone induction group had significantly longer time to extubation (8.8 vs 7.1 min, P < 0.05).
- Thiopentone group showed greater initial sedation in the Post-Anesthesia Recovery Room (PARR).
- Sedation differences diminished within 30 minutes post-anesthesia.
Conclusions:
- Intravenous thiopentone induction slightly prolongs anesthesia emergence in midazolam-premedicated pediatric surgical patients compared to halothane.
- Anesthesia induction choice impacts early postoperative recovery in children.
Abstract:
This prospective, randomized trial of paediatric surgical outpatients, premedicated with oral midazolam, was designed to determine if an intravenous thiopentone induction of anaesthesia prolongs postoperative recovery compared to an inhalation induction with halothane. One hundred children, one to ten years of age, undergoing ENT surgical procedures of 30-60 min duration received midazolam 0.5 mg.kg-1 with atropine 0.03 mg.kg-1 and were randomized to either halothane (Group 1, n = 50) or a thiopentone induction (Group 2, n = 50) technique, followed by a standardized anaesthetic-protocol. Time to extubation was significantly greater in the thiopentone group (8.8 +/- 4 min vs 7.1 +/- 3 min, P < 0.05). Patients receiving thiopentone were also more sedated than the halothane group on arrival in the PARR (3.9 +/- 1.5, 3.3 +/- 1.7, respectively P < 0.05), but the differences disappeared after 30 min. Children premedicated with oral midazolam who receive an intravenous thiopentone induction have a slightly prolonged emergence from anesthesia compared to children induced with halothane.
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Sedatives and Hypnotics Drugs: Barbiturates
Drug Delivery: Enteral Route
Drugs in...
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Treatment Strategies

