Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Decision and Response in Dual-Task Interference

Van Selst M1, Jolicoeur

  • 1NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, 94035

Cognitive Psychology
|August 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

This study challenges the response selection bottleneck theory by failing to replicate findings that suggested a bottleneck at response execution. Results indicate response preparation and task strategy do not explain the observed effects with decreasing stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA).

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Production of glomus intraradices propagules, an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, in an airlift bioreactor

Biotechnology and bioengineering·1999
Same author

Intracellular pH in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. A symbiotic physiological marker

Plant physiology·1998
Same author

Comment on "Quantum Monte Carlo Approach to Elementary Excitations of Antiferromagnetic Heisenberg Chains"

Physical review letters·1996
Same author

Experimental Evidence of a Haldane Gap in an S=2 Quasi-Linear-Chain Antiferromagnet.

Physical review letters·1996
Same author

S=2 antiferromagnetic quantum spin chain.

Physical review. B, Condensed matter·1996
Same author

Generalized helimagnets between two and four dimensions.

Physical review letters·1996

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Information Processing
  • Experimental Psychology

Background:

  • The response selection bottleneck hypothesis posits a limit on concurrent task processing, particularly at the response selection stage.
  • Previous research indicates that short stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between tasks delays Task2 response selection.
  • Inconsistencies arise from studies suggesting a bottleneck at response execution, especially when comparing detection and discrimination tasks at short SOAs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the validity of the response selection bottleneck hypothesis by examining response times in dual-task scenarios.
  • To replicate and scrutinize the Karlin and Kestenbaum (1968) findings regarding the impact of SOA on response time differences between detection and discrimination.
  • To determine if response execution, preparation, or task strategy can account for the observed effects at varying SOAs.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments replicated Karlin and Kestenbaum's (1968) tasks and procedures involving detection and discrimination with varying stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA).
  • A further experiment examined the difference between 2-choice and 3-choice discrimination times across different SOAs to isolate response execution bottlenecks.
  • Additional experiments manipulated response preparation and task strategy to assess their influence on dual-task performance.

Main Results:

  • The Karlin and Kestenbaum (1968) result, suggesting a response execution bottleneck, was not consistently replicated.
  • In the one instance where the result was replicated, a simple response execution bottleneck was ruled out by stable differences in discrimination times across SOAs.
  • Response preparation and task strategy did not significantly explain the attenuation of response selection effects at short SOAs.

Conclusions:

  • The findings do not support a simple response execution bottleneck as an explanation for dual-task interference.
  • The response selection bottleneck hypothesis remains a viable explanation for limitations in concurrent task processing, even with complex tasks.
  • Further research is needed to fully elucidate the mechanisms underlying dual-task performance and the interaction between response selection and execution stages.