Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interaction fallacy

A Morabia1, T Ten Have, J R Landis

  • 1Clinical Epidemiology Division, University Hospital, Genève, Switzerland.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|July 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correlates of 1-Year Change in Quality of Life in Patients with Urologic Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: Findings from the Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Chronic Pelvic Pain (MAPP) Research Network.

The Journal of urology·2020
Same author

Urinalysis in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.

European journal of neurology·2019
Same author

Randomized multicenter clinical trial of myofascial physical therapy in women with interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome and pelvic floor tenderness.

The Journal of urology·2012
Same author

Variability of creatinine measurements in clinical laboratories: results from the CRIC study.

American journal of nephrology·2010
Same author

Undocumented migrants in Switzerland: geographical origin versus legal status as risk factor for tuberculosis.

Journal of immigrant and minority health·2009
Same author

Epidemic and population patterns in the Chinese Empire (243 B.C.E. to 1911 C.E.): quantitative analysis of a unique but neglected epidemic catalogue.

Epidemiology and infection·2009

Interaction fallacy occurs when odds ratios suggest a non-existent interaction, misleading risk ratio analysis. This study illustrates this fallacy using BRCA1 mutations and breast cancer risk, highlighting conditions for its occurrence.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Statistical measures like odds ratios and risk ratios are crucial in epidemiological studies.
  • Heterogeneity in effect measures can sometimes indicate complex biological interactions.
  • Misinterpretation of statistical results can lead to erroneous conclusions in medical research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define and describe the phenomenon of "interaction fallacy."
  • To provide a hypothetical example of interaction fallacy in breast cancer risk.
  • To outline conditions under which interaction fallacy may arise.

Main Methods:

  • Definition of interaction fallacy based on odds ratio heterogeneity versus risk ratio.
  • Construction of a hypothetical scenario using literature data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of conditions leading to interaction fallacy.

    • Main Results:

    • Interaction fallacy is identified as a situation where odds ratio heterogeneity falsely suggests an interaction.
    • A hypothetical case demonstrates interaction fallacy involving BRCA1 mutations, age at first live birth, and breast cancer risk.
    • General conditions conducive to interaction fallacy are presented.

    Conclusions:

    • Researchers must be cautious when interpreting odds ratio heterogeneity, as it may not reflect true interactions.
    • Understanding interaction fallacy is essential for accurate risk assessment in genetic and epidemiological studies.
    • The study provides a framework for identifying and avoiding interaction fallacy in research.