Related Experiment Videos
The alternate recipient list for heart transplantation: does it work?
H Laks1, F G Scholl, D C Drinkwater
1Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Summary
The alternate recipient list for heart transplantation offers a valid option for patients who might otherwise be denied. This approach provides similar outcomes to the standard list, utilizing organs that may otherwise go to waste.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Transplantation Medicine
- Surgical Outcomes
Background:
- High mortality rates for patients awaiting heart transplantation due to organ shortages.
- Development of an alternate recipient list for patients over 65 or needing a third transplant.
- Utilizing marginal donor organs for patients who would otherwise be denied transplantation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and ethics of the alternate recipient list for heart transplantation.
- To compare outcomes of patients on the alternate list versus the standard waiting list.
- To assess the utilization of marginal donor organs.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 22 patients on the alternate recipient list (1991-1996).
- Comparison of 17 transplanted patients from the alternate list with 266 patients from the standard list.
- Evaluation of early mortality and actuarial survival rates.
Main Results:
- Early mortality for the alternate group was 11.8% (2/17) versus 5.6% (15/266) for the standard group.
- Actuarial survival at 6 months and 1 year was 74.5% for the alternate group.
- Actuarial survival at 6 months and 1 year was 86.8% and 83.1% for the standard group, respectively.
- No significant difference in early mortality or survival between the two groups.
Conclusions:
- The alternate recipient list is a valid and ethical option for heart transplantation candidates.
- Patients on the alternate list experience similar early and medium-term outcomes compared to the standard list.
- The alternate list facilitates the use of donor organs that might otherwise be wasted.