Related Experiment Videos
Computed tomographic study of bone availability for facial prosthesis-bearing endosteal implants
M Klein1, H Menneking, K Neumann
1Berlin Center for Facial Prosthesis, Virchow Clinic, Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany.
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
|August 1, 1997
Summary
This study evaluated bone availability for facial prostheses using extraoral Brånemark implants in 56 patients. Results show high implant survival rates, particularly for auricular defects, with minimal complications.
Area of Science:
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Facial defects often necessitate reconstructive surgery, with osseointegrated implants offering a viable solution for prosthesis support.
- Assessing bone availability is crucial for successful extraoral implant placement in patients with complex facial anatomy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate bone availability for extraoral Brånemark implants in patients with facial defects using computed tomography.
- To determine the success rates of implants used to support facial prostheses.
Main Methods:
- Computed tomographic scans of 56 patients with facial defects were analyzed.
- Bone depths were measured in key facial regions: auriculotemporal, infraorbital, lateroorbital, supraorbital, medioorbital, and nasal skeleton.
- Implant survival rates and complications were tracked over three years.
Main Results:
- Bone availability varied across facial regions, with limitations noted near the frontal and maxillary sinuses and in the nasal region.
- The auriculotemporal region consistently offered sufficient bone width.
- Three-year implant survival rates were 100% for auricular defects and 85.8% for orbital defects, with few serious complications.
Conclusions:
- Extraoral Brånemark implants are a successful option for supporting facial prostheses, especially in auricular reconstructions.
- Careful pre-operative assessment of bone dimensions is essential, particularly in the infraorbital and supraorbital areas.
- While generally safe, some patients may require secondary corrective surgery.