Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Prognostic indices in peritonitis

C Ohmann1, T Hau

  • 1Department of General and Trauma Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Hepato-Gastroenterology
|July 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Social media attention and citations of published outputs from re-use of clinical trial data: a matched comparison with articles published in the same journals.

BMC medical research methodology·2021
Same author

Health care utilization and excess costs after pelvic fractures among older people in Germany.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2021
Same author

Towards a European health research and innovation cloud (HRIC).

Genome medicine·2020
Same author

European survey on national training activities in clinical research.

Trials·2019
Same author

Contractility of the epididymal duct: function, regulation and potential drug effects

Reproduction (Cambridge, England)·2018
Same author

Raising standards in clinical research - The impact of the ECRIN data centre certification programme, 2011-2016.

Contemporary clinical trials communications·2018
Same journal

Palliative Surgery for Gastric Cancer with Gastric Outlet Obstruction or Anemia due to Tumor Bleeding.

Hepato-gastroenterology·2016
Same journal

A Novel "Artery First" Approach Allowing Safe Resection in Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: The Uncinate Process First Approach.

Hepato-gastroenterology·2016
Same journal

A Phase I Study of S-1 and Gemcitabine with Concurrent Radiotherapy in Patients with Non-Metastatic Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Hepato-gastroenterology·2016
Same journal

A Novel Approach for Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation with the Guidewire Left in the Pancreatic Duct to Ensure Pancreatic Stenting.

Hepato-gastroenterology·2016
Same journal

Which Factors are Predictive for Mortality among Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis?

Hepato-gastroenterology·2016
Same journal

Hydrodynamics Analysis and CFD Simulation of Portal Venous System by TIPS and LS.

Hepato-gastroenterology·2016
See all related articles

This review updates prognostic factors and scoring systems for peritonitis. Key scores like APACHE II and MPI aid in assessing severity, guiding treatment, and ensuring quality in clinical trials for better patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Peritonitis research
  • Clinical scoring systems
  • Prognostic factor analysis

Background:

  • Peritonitis management is complex, influenced by patient reserves, disease severity, and treatment success.
  • Accurate prognostic assessment is crucial for effective patient management and clinical trial design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an updated review of prognostic factors and scoring systems in peritonitis.
  • To evaluate the utility of various scoring systems in assessing disease severity and guiding treatment.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on prognostic factors and scoring systems for peritonitis.
  • Analysis of the application and evaluation data for established scoring systems like APACHE II and MPI.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Score (APACHE II) and Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) are validated tools for severity assessment and risk stratification.
  • Several scoring systems, including APACHE II and MPI, are useful for clinical trial comparability and quality assurance.
  • Models like the Prognostic Peritonitis Model and Abdominal Re-operation Predictive Index aid in treatment selection, particularly for re-operation.

Conclusions:

  • APACHE II and MPI are valuable instruments for risk assessment and clinical trial analysis in peritonitis.
  • APACHE II is particularly effective for evaluating treatment policies and quality assurance.
  • Further research is needed to support the use of these scores in individual patient care.