Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modulation detection interference with two-component masker modulators

S Sheft1, W A Yost

  • 1Parmly Hearing Institute, Loyola University of Chicago, Illinois 60626, USA.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|August 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The perceptual tone/noise ratio of merged iterated rippled noises.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000
Same author

Loudness recalibration as a function of level.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000
Same author

The precedence effect.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1999
Same author

The role of the envelope in processing iterated rippled noise.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1999
Same author

Binaural modulation detection interference.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1997
Same author

Discrimination of rippled-spectrum noise from flat-spectrum noise by chinchillas: evidence for a spectral dominance region.

Hearing research·1997
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Masker modulation significantly impairs the detection of probe modulation, especially with multiple masker components. Interference increases with masker beating depth and number of carriers, but decreases at higher beat rates.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal detection theory

Background:

  • Auditory masking is a fundamental phenomenon in hearing.
  • Modulation masking, where a masker's modulation interferes with probe modulation detection, is a complex area of study.
  • Previous research indicates masker modulation can degrade target modulation perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of masker modulation on amplitude modulation detection thresholds.
  • To examine the role of masker modulator complexity (one vs. two components) and beat rate on interference.
  • To explore masking effects not explained by spectral envelope representations.

Main Methods:

  • Participants detected amplitude modulation of a tonal carrier.
  • Maskers with one or two sinusoidal components, modulated at specific frequencies, were used.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Detection thresholds were measured under various masker conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • Masker modulation significantly impaired probe modulation detection.
    • Two-component maskers caused greater interference than single components, especially at a 4-Hz beat rate.
    • Interference increased with masker beating depth and carrier number.
    • Increasing the beat rate from 4 to 10 Hz reduced interference.
    • Observed masking effects were not fully explained by spectral envelope analysis.

    Conclusions:

    • Masker modulation presents a significant challenge for detecting target modulation.
    • The complexity and characteristics of masker modulation, including beat rate and depth, critically influence auditory masking.
    • Current spectral models may not fully capture the mechanisms underlying this type of auditory interference.