Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Particle Agglutination Method for Poliovirus Identification
Published on: April 20, 2011
Parental knowledge and choice regarding live and inactivated poliovirus vaccines
M L Thoms1, P Z Bodnar, J C O'Donovan
1Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Md, USA.
Insights
Most parents are unaware of the two available poliovirus vaccines. However, they prioritize preventing paralytic poliomyelitis, often preferring inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) over oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) despite potential injection schedules.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Immunology
- Public Health
Background:
- The live oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) is associated with rare cases of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis.
- Revised immunization guidelines consider the risks and benefits of OPV and inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV).
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess parental awareness of poliovirus vaccine options (IPV vs. OPV).
- To understand parental preferences regarding different poliovirus vaccine schedules and their rationale.
Main Methods:
- Interviews were conducted with 240 parents of children aged 2 weeks to 18 months.
- Parents received standardized information about IPV and OPV before expressing their choices.
Main Results:
- A majority of parents (62.5%) were unaware of the two available poliovirus vaccines.
- Most parents (75%) would consult a physician before choosing a vaccine schedule.
- If choosing independently, 61.3% preferred IPV and 3 injections over OPV and 2 injections, prioritizing reduced risk of paralytic poliomyelitis.
Conclusions:
- Parental preference for poliovirus vaccination is influenced by the perceived risk of paralytic poliomyelitis.
- While the number of injections is a consideration, parents are willing to opt for more injections to prevent vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis.
Background:
Concern about the 8 to 10 cases per year of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis caused by the live oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) has led to revised guidelines for immunization of children in the United States. The use of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) at 2 and 4 months of age could require administration of 3 injections per visit until combination products are available.
Objective:
To determine parents' knowledge of poliovirus vaccines and the choices they would make between IPV and OPV.
Methods:
Parents of 240 children aged 2 weeks to 18 months under the care of 10 private pediatricians in the Baltimore, Md, metropolitan area were interviewed prior to the announcement of revised advisory committee guidelines.
Results:
The majority (62.5%) of respondents were not aware that 2 poliovirus vaccines are available. After reviewing standardized information about the vaccines and 2 alternate schedules, most (75%) parents would consult someone (primarily their physician) before making a final choice of a vaccine schedule. If parents made the choice without consulting anyone else, 61.3% would choose to have their child receive IPV and 3 injections per visit as compared with an all-OPV schedule and 2 injections per visit. Inactivated poliovirus vaccine was preferred by most parents because it would reduce the risk for vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis. Oral poliovirus vaccine was preferred by 37.9% of parents primarily because it was given orally. If the number of injections at each visit was the same for both vaccines, 76.3% of parents would choose the IPV schedule, and if the number of injections was reduced to 2 by combining IPV with another vaccine, 87.9% of parents would choose IPV.
Conclusion:
The number of injections per visit is an important issue, but a majority of parents would choose to have their children receive extra injections to prevent the low risk for vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis.
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Vaccines
Smallpox
Chickenpox
Poliomyelitis
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease

