Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Advanced digital mammography

R B Schilling1, J D Cox, S R Sharma

  • 1PGI Corporation, Los Altos Hills, CA, USA.

Journal of Digital Imaging
|August 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evidence of Spin-Interference Effects in Exclusive J/ψ→e^{+}e^{-} Photoproduction in Ultraperipheral Heavy-Ion Collisions.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

First Observation of Deuteron-Λ Correlations at RHIC.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Observation of Charmonium Sequential Suppression in Heavy-Ion Collisions at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Energy Independence of the Collins Asymmetry in p^{↑}p Collisions.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Precision Measurement of Net-Proton-Number Fluctuations in Au+Au Collisions at RHIC.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Measurement of Two-Point Energy Correlators within Jets in p+p Collisions at sqrt[s]=200  GeV.

Physical review letters·2025

Mammography misses 10-30% of breast cancers. Quantitative analysis of microcalcifications and masses could improve accuracy in detecting breast cancer, reducing unnecessary biopsies.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Oncology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Mammography is crucial for early breast cancer detection.
  • A significant percentage of mammograms yield false negatives.
  • Many biopsies are performed on benign findings, indicating low specificity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore quantitative analysis of mammographic features.
  • To enhance the specificity of breast cancer diagnosis.
  • To reduce false-negative mammogram results and unnecessary biopsies.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of radiographic features, including microcalcifications and masses.
  • Quantitative assessment of imaging characteristics.
  • Radiological interpretation and diagnostic evaluation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Quantitative analysis shows potential for improved diagnostic accuracy.
  • Identifying specific features may differentiate malignant from benign findings.
  • Enhanced specificity in interpreting mammograms is achievable.

Conclusions:

  • Quantitative analysis of mammographic features can aid radiologists.
  • Improved specificity can lead to earlier and more accurate breast cancer detection.
  • This approach may reduce patient anxiety and healthcare costs associated with unnecessary biopsies.