Death themes in anorexia nervosa: dimensions for a reply to Jackson et al

To provide a critical, theoretical response to some ideas argued initially by Jackson and Davidson (Int J Eat Dis, 5, 821-835, 1986). Those ideas developed an understanding of anorexia nervosa in terms of disturbed death ideation and the notion of the anorexia nervosa sufferer as a "survivor." This paper was intended to broaden the frame of reference for a consideration of the relationship between eating disorders and death ideation.

The approach is a reflection on three domains of thinking about death and destructiveness, two within psychology, the third a perspective provided by philosophy. Specifically, early post-Freudian work, personal construct psychology, and the philosophical tradition that makes death generally significant in human life, that is, Existentialism, are discussed in terms of their illumination of the ideas under review.

The result is a series of speculative observations that constitute an argument that these three domains together provide a strong countercritical position to the idea of a universal, even a general significance of death, particularly etiologically, in anorexia nervosa.

The discussion suggests that the particular significance of death ideation in a multidimensional condition like anorexia nervosa must be derived in each particular case where it will sometimes be more, sometimes less significant, and, importantly, will mean something different to each individual sufferer.