Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Biased mutations and microsatellite variation

L A Zhivotovsky1, M W Feldman, S A Grishechkin

  • 1Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.

Molecular Biology and Evolution
|September 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cultural niche construction and human evolution.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2017
Same author

Tracking and predicting hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) epidemics in China by Baidu queries.

Epidemiology and infection·2017
Same author

[A Detection of Allelic Variants at Microsatellite Markers by Using Capillary and Traditional Electrophoresis].

Genetika·2016
Same author

Hybrids between chum Oncorhynchus keta and pink Oncorhynchus gorbuscha salmon: age, growth and morphology and effects on salmon production.

Journal of fish biology·2016
Same author

[Genetic History of Salmonid Fishes of the Genus Oncorhynchus].

Genetika·2015
Same author

Efficiency of the inbreeding coefficient f and other estimators in detecting null alleles, as revealed by empirical data of locus oke3 across 65 populations of chum salmon Oncorhynchus keta.

Journal of fish biology·2014
Same journal

The life history of recessive deleterious alleles as seen through the eyes of a honey bee (Apis mellifera).

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Severe bottleneck of ancient Homo populations: Insights from computational modeling and relevant fossil evidence.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Population Epigenetics: Deciphering DNA Methylation Diversity and its Implications for Health, Disease, and Evolution.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Genomic signature of repeated transitions to diurnality in spiders.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Phylogenomic blind spots: The limits of UCE and BUSCO loci in the presence of gene flow.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

seqLens: Optimizing Language Models for Genomic Predictions.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
See all related articles

Mutation bias influences microsatellite variation. Accounting for this bias in population genetics models yields higher estimates for divergence times between human populations.

Area of Science:

  • Population Genetics
  • Molecular Evolution
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Microsatellite loci variation is shaped by mutation bias and random genetic drift.
  • Understanding mutation bias is crucial for accurate population genetic analyses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the dynamics of population statistics and genetic distance under mutation bias and drift.
  • To derive mathematical expressions for microsatellite statistics over time and at equilibrium.
  • To estimate mutation bias parameters and assess its impact on divergence time estimates.

Main Methods:

  • Developed theoretical models for population statistics under multiple stepwise mutations with linear bias and random drift.
  • Derived time-dependent and equilibrium expressions for genetic variation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applied the derived expressions to human and chimpanzee genetic data.

    • Main Results:

    • Estimated the regression coefficient of mutation bias on allele size to be between -0.0064 and -0.013 in humans and chimpanzees.
    • Demonstrated that incorporating mutation bias increases divergence time estimates compared to models without bias.
    • Estimated the human population split between African and non-African groups at 183,000–222,000 years ago, assuming one-step mutations.

    Conclusions:

    • Mutation bias is a significant factor in microsatellite evolution and population divergence.
    • The inclusion of mutation bias leads to more accurate, albeit higher, estimates of population split times.
    • Multistep mutation models suggest lower divergence times than single-step models when accounting for bias.