Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Programme evaluation in problem-based and community-based nursing education

E M Bitzer1

  • 1Academic Development Bureau, University of the Orange free state.

Curationis
|March 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[What motivates patients with atopic diseases to search the internet-a focus group study on expectations and demands].

Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete·2018
Same author

[A Consensus German Reporting Standard for Secondary Data Analyses, Version 2 (STROSA-STandardisierte BerichtsROutine für SekundärdatenAnalysen)].

Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))·2016
Same author

A Consensus German Reporting Standard for Secondary Data Analyses, Version 2 (STROSA-STandardisierte BerichtsROutine für SekundärdatenAnalysen).

Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))·2016
Same author

[Erratum to: Prostate cancer in routine healthcare. Health-related quality of life after inpatient treatment].

Der Urologe. Ausg. A·2016
Same author

[Linking claims data and beneficiary survey information to report on the quality of health care: potential, pitfalls, and perspectives].

Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))·2015
Same author

[Prostate cancer in routine healthcare: health-related quality of life after inpatient treatment].

Der Urologe. Ausg. A·2014
Same journal

Experience of participation in a WhatsApp support group for empowering newly graduated nurses during transition in the Western Cape, South Africa.

Curationis·2026
Same journal

Classroom to crisis: Exploring nursing students' preparedness for emergency unit placements in the Western Cape.

Curationis·2026
Same journal

Prevalence of stress and associated factors among nursing students in Limpopo province, South Africa.

Curationis·2026
Same journal

Exploring factors affecting nurses' job satisfaction at a regional hospital in Namibia.

Curationis·2026
Same journal

Registered professional nurses' experiences regarding supervision of nursing care at selected hospitals of Limpopo province.

Curationis·2026
Same journal

Patient experiences of opposite gender nurse-patient interactions at public health facilities in Namibia.

Curationis·2026
See all related articles

This study evaluated a new Master

Area of Science:

  • Nursing Education
  • Higher Education Evaluation
  • Curriculum Development

Background:

  • A new Master's Degree Programme in Nursing Education was developed at a South African university.
  • The programme utilizes a problem- and community-based learning model.
  • Formative evaluation is crucial for refining new academic programmes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a formative evaluation of the Master's Degree Programme in Nursing Education.
  • To discuss meta-evaluation findings and identify limitations in evaluating problem- and community-based programmes.
  • To propose guidelines for overcoming identified evaluation limitations.

Main Methods:

  • Case study approach.
  • Inclusion of findings from external evaluators.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Focus on meta-evaluation (second-order evaluation) of the programme's assessment.

    • Main Results:

    • External evaluation findings were presented.
    • Meta-evaluation identified current limitations in assessing problem- and community-based degree programmes.
    • Specific challenges in evaluating innovative pedagogical approaches were highlighted.

    Conclusions:

    • The evaluation provided insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the new nursing education program.
    • Limitations in current evaluation methodologies for community-based learning programmes were identified.
    • Guidelines are suggested to enhance the evaluation of similar future programmes.