Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Effect of small focal errors on vision

A D Miller1, M J Kris, A C Griffiths

  • 1CSIRO Mathematical and Information Sciences, Glen Osmond, South Australia.

Optometry and Vision Science : Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry
|July 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Gross and cytological appearance of oral gout in a crested gecko (Correlophus ciliatus) with end-stage nephropathy.

The Journal of small animal practice·2026
Same author

Four Cases of the Melanotic Variant of Malignant Nerve Sheath Tumour: a Rare, Aggressive Neoplasm in Young Dogs with a Predilection for the Spinal Cord.

Journal of comparative pathology·2020
Same author

Intracerebral Astrocytoma in a Horse.

Journal of comparative pathology·2020
Same author

Immunohistochemical Characterization of Immune Cell Infiltration in Feline Glioma.

Journal of comparative pathology·2018
Same author

Neuroendodermal cyst in the fourth ventricle of a dog.

Australian veterinary journal·2017
Same author

Surgical removal of a choroid plexus oncocytoma in an adult cat.

The Journal of small animal practice·2017
Same journal

Comparison of neutralization and disinfection kinetics in povidone iodine- and hydrogen peroxide-based soft contact lens care solutions.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
Same journal

Agreement between ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer metrics from widefield optical coherence tomography and Goldmann II, III, and V in glaucoma.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
Same journal

Repeatability of SpotChecks contrast sensitivity test in macular disease.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
Same journal

Reflections on emerging therapies for inherited retinal diseases following a community education event: A qualitative exploration.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
Same journal

Optical myopia control interventions: Evaluation of methods and success in a real-world population.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
Same journal

Influence of corneal endothelial cell density after penetrating keratoplasty on contact lens induced corneal swelling.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
See all related articles

Even small focus errors of +0.25 D in distance vision significantly impact wearer satisfaction. This highlights the importance of precise vision correction for optimal visual acuity and comfort.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Optometry
  • Vision Science

Background:

  • Accurate refractive correction is crucial for optimal visual function.
  • Understanding the impact of minor refractive errors on patient experience is essential for clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the visual quality effects of small plus focal errors (+0.25 D) in spectacle wearers.
  • To assess patient satisfaction with deliberate focal errors in distance vision correction.

Main Methods:

  • Spectacle wear trial with deliberately induced small plus focal errors (+0.25 D sphere and cylinder).
  • Subjective questionnaires assessing wearer satisfaction and visual function.
  • Laboratory measures of visual function to evaluate the impact of focus errors.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A significant proportion of wearers detected and expressed dissatisfaction with focal errors as small as +0.25 D.
  • Both spherical and cylindrical errors of +0.25 D were found to be noticeable and problematic.

Conclusions:

  • Clinical practice of refining refraction to the nearest 0.25 D is supported by these findings.
  • Slight undercorrection of hypermetropes may be beneficial for critical patients to utilize accommodation for improved distance vision.