Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

A Multi-Modal Approach to Assessing Recovery in Youth Athletes Following Concussion
Published on: September 25, 2014
Children's perspectives on injury and close-call experiences: sex differences in injury-outcome processes
1Psychology Department, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Insights
Boys reported more injuries and close calls than girls. Boys were more likely to repeat risky behaviors, blame bad luck, and less likely to inform parents about injuries.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric injury prevention
- Child psychology
- Behavioral science
Background:
- Understanding gender differences in childhood injuries is crucial for targeted prevention strategies.
- Previous research indicates potential disparities in risk-taking behaviors between boys and girls.
- Factors influencing injury reporting and parental communication require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare boys' and girls' self-reports of injuries and near-misses.
- To identify gender-specific factors related to injury occurrence, blame attribution, and reporting behaviors.
- To explore how children learn to avoid injury-risk behaviors.
Main Methods:
- A structured telephone interview was conducted over 14 days with children.
- Data collected included antecedent events, attributions of blame, injury severity ratings, and parental notification.
- Comparison of injury and close call reports between boys and girls.
Main Results:
- Boys reported significantly more injuries and close calls than girls.
- Boys were more likely to be injured in peer settings and repeat risky behaviors.
- Boys were more prone to attribute injuries to bad luck and less likely to report severity or inform parents.
Conclusions:
- Boys exhibit distinct injury patterns and risk-related behaviors compared to girls.
- Gender-based differences in blame attribution and parental communication may impact injury prevention efforts.
- Interventions should consider these gender-specific factors to enhance children's injury avoidance learning.
Abstract:
Compared boy's and girls' self-reports of injuries and close calls, using a structured telephone interview that was conducted each of 14 days to obtain reports of antecedent events (past memories of similar injuries, immediate injury context), attributions of blame (own behavior, other's behavior, bad luck), ratings of injury severity, telling parents about injuries, and the factors that influence children's learning to avoid injury-risk behaviors. In comparison to girls, boys reported more injuries and close calls, were more likely to be with peers when injured, were more likely to repeat behaviors that had resulted in prior injuries, were more likely to erroneously attribute injuries to bad luck, were more likely to rate injuries as low in severity, and were less likely to tell their parents about these events.
Related Concept Videos
Bullying
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction
Spinal Cord Injury ll: Pathophysiology

