Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quality control of measured x-ray beam data

B E Bjärngard1, P Vadash, C P Ceberg

  • 1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104, USA. bjarngard@rxt.upenn.edu

Medical Physics
|September 26, 1997
PubMed
Summary

This study validates a semi-empirical formula for assessing medical x-ray beam quality. The formula accurately identifies errors in measured data, confirming its utility in quality assurance for radiation therapy.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reference dosimetry at the neutron capture therapy facility at Studsvik.

Medical physics·2003
Same author

Photon quality correction factors for ionization chambers in an epithermal neutron beam.

Physics in medicine and biology·2002
Same author

Doses near the surface during total-body irradiation with 15 MV X-rays.

International journal of cancer·2002
Same author

Characteristics of bremsstrahlung in electron beams.

Medical physics·2001
Same author

Modeling the output ratio in air for megavoltage photon beams.

Medical physics·2001
Same author

Toward clinical application of prompt gamma spectroscopy for in vivo monitoring of boron uptake in boron neutron capture therapy.

Medical physics·2001

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Radiological Physics

Background:

  • Accurate measurement of medical x-ray beam data is crucial for radiation therapy.
  • Evaluating the quality of these measurements ensures treatment efficacy and patient safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if a semi-empirical formula can effectively judge the quality of measured x-ray beam data.
  • To assess the formula's ability to identify discrepancies and errors in beam characteristics.

Main Methods:

  • Fitted tissue-phantom ratios (TPR) and output factors for 4-25 MV accelerators to a semi-empirical formula.
  • Separated dose contributions into primary (exponential attenuation with beam hardening) and phantom-scattered photons (scatter-to-primary dose ratio).
  • Evaluated two approaches: determining coefficients from narrow-beam geometry versus extracting them via fitting.

Main Results:

  • Measured and fitted data agreed within +/- 2%, with random differences and a standard deviation typically of 0.7%.
  • The formula effectively identified singular points with errors and revealed systematic errors through increased standard deviation.
  • When derived by fitting, the attenuation coefficient deviated significantly from experimental values.

Conclusions:

  • The semi-empirical formula is suitable for evaluating and verifying measured x-ray beam data in water.
  • For the most physically accurate results, attenuation and hardening coefficients should be determined using narrow-beam geometry.
  • The attenuation coefficient serves as a reliable indicator of both primary and scatter dose components, thus reflecting beam quality.

Related Experiment Videos