Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Making things move--the options for computer-based displays

M J Cox1

  • 1Department of Optometry, University of Brandford, UK. M.Cox@bradford.ac.uk

Spatial Vision
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Antarctic krill vertical migrations modulate seasonal carbon export.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Scientific echosounder data provide a predator's view of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba).

Scientific data·2023
Same author

The characteristics of krill swarms in relation to aggregating Antarctic blue whales.

Scientific reports·2019
Same author

Levels of agreement between student and staff assessments of clinical skills in performing cavity preparation in artificial teeth.

European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe·2014
Same author

Femtosecond study of the deuteron-transfer dynamics of naphtol salts in water.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2010
Same author

Direct observation of proton transfer in ice Ih using femtosecond spectroscopy.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2010
Same journal

Comment on 'angle illusion on a picture's surface' by Hammad et al. (2008).

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Feature-based attentional modulation increases with stimulus separation in divided-attention tasks.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Spatial distance between target and irrelevant patch modulates detection in a texture segmentation task.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Inhibition related impairments of coherent motion perception in the attention-induced motion blindness paradigm.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Recognition units in reading: backward masking experiments.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Spatial-temporal modeling of interactive image interpretation.

Spatial vision·2009
See all related articles

This study explores two methods for creating moving visual stimuli on computer displays: memory manipulation and palette manipulation. Each technique offers different trade-offs in flexibility, stimulus control, and computational resource requirements for researchers.

Area of Science:

  • Computer Graphics
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Generating dynamic visual stimuli is crucial for research in perception and interaction.
  • Computer-controlled displays offer flexibility but require efficient methods for animation.
  • Previous techniques often faced limitations in balancing stimulus complexity with system resources.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and compare methods for producing moving stimuli on computer displays.
  • To analyze the advantages and limitations of memory manipulation and palette manipulation techniques.
  • To guide researchers in selecting appropriate methods based on available computational resources and experimental needs.

Main Methods:

  • Memory manipulation techniques discussed include memory windowing, memory movement, and memory animation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Palette manipulation techniques explored are look-up-table splitting, bit-splitting, and rotation.
  • Analysis focuses on the trade-offs between spatial-temporal control, memory usage, and processing capacity.

    • Main Results:

    • Memory windowing and movement are suitable for low-resource systems but have limited temporal control.
    • Memory animation offers high flexibility but demands greater computational power.
    • Palette manipulation methods vary in their suitability for different stimulus types and resource constraints, with some offering good control at the cost of flexibility or presentation duration.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice between memory and palette manipulation depends on specific research requirements for stimulus control and available hardware.
    • Memory animation and look-up-table animation provide the most comprehensive control but require significant computational resources.
    • Simpler palette manipulation techniques are viable for low-capacity systems, though often with compromises in stimulus properties.