Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
Minimising delays to thrombolysis in patients developing acute myocardial infarction in hospital
1Department of Cardiology, University, Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Insights
Patients experiencing acute myocardial infarction (heart attack) symptoms often delay seeking help, leading to significant treatment delays. Early identification and direct admission to cardiac wards can improve outcomes for high-risk individuals.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Internal Medicine
- Emergency Medicine
Background:
- Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) requires prompt diagnosis and treatment.
- In-hospital cardiac events can occur in patients admitted for other conditions.
- Timeliness of treatment significantly impacts patient prognosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare clinical features and management of community- vs. in-hospital-acquired myocardial infarctions.
- To identify factors contributing to delays in AMI treatment.
- To evaluate the impact of initial ward admission on treatment and outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 100 patients (50 community-acquired AMI, 50 in-hospital cardiac events).
- Review of clinical presentations, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and treatment records.
- Comparison of time delays from symptom onset to thrombolysis.
Main Results:
- A significant proportion of in-hospital events occurred within 24 hours of admission.
- Chest pain and ECG evidence of ischemia identified high-risk patients.
- Delays in seeking medical help were a major contributor to overall treatment delay.
- In-hospital patients experienced shorter median delays to thrombolysis compared to community patients (120 vs. 287 minutes).
Conclusions:
- Patients at high risk for AMI can be identified by chest pain and ECG findings.
- Admission to non-specialist wards may lead to suboptimal treatment and delayed thrombolysis.
- Direct admission of high-risk patients to a cardiac high-dependency unit for the initial 24 hours is recommended to improve care.
Abstract:
We investigated the clinical features and management of 50 patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction from the community and 50 patients presenting with cardiac symptoms who developed an infarct after being admitted to a general medical ward for observation. Nineteen of the 50 patients initially admitted to non-specialist wards were found retrospectively to have sustained an infarct prior to hospital admission. Of the remaining 31 admission in this group, 24 developed symptoms within 24 hours of admission, 26 presented with chest pain, while 21 had evidence of acute coronary ischaemia on the admission electrocardiograph. Of the 26 patients who presented with chest pain, 20 were treated with aspirin, 13 with intravenous nitrate and four with heparin. Median delay from onset of symptoms to thrombolysis with in-hospital patients was 120 minutes and for community patients 287 minutes. Interestingly, the greatest component of this delay in both groups was the time taken for patients to decide to seek assistance after developing acute symptoms. Patients at high risk of developing acute myocardial infarction within 24 hours of hospital admission may be identified by a history of chest pain and electrocardiographic evidence of acute coronary ischaemia at admission. Such patients may experience suboptimal treatment and delays to thrombolysis if admitted to nonspecialist wards, but this may be reduced by admitting all 'high risk' patients directly to a high dependency cardiac ward for the first 24 hours after presentation.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

