Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Controlling false positive rates in prognostic factor analyses with small samples

Q Liu1, Y Li, J M Boyett

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38101, USA.

Statistics in Medicine
|October 6, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Neuroimaging Center of the Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium-collaborative neuroimaging in pediatric brain tumor research: a work in progress.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2007
Same author

Clinical heterogeneity in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia with 11q23 rearrangements.

Leukemia·2003
Same author

Somatostatin-immunoreactive interneurons contribute to lateral inhibitory circuits in the dentate gyrus of control and epileptic rats.

Hippocampus·2001
Same author

Intellectual outcome after reduced-dose radiation therapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy for medulloblastoma: a Children's Cancer Group study.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2001
Same author

Bone mineral decrements in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: frequency of occurrence and risk factors for their development.

Leukemia·2001
Same author

Long-term results of Total Therapy studies 11, 12 and 13A for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia at St Jude Children's Research Hospital.

Leukemia·2001

This study introduces a new exact adjustment method for multiple hypothesis testing in medical research. It offers a less conservative alternative to the Bonferroni adjustment, especially for correlated risk factors.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Research
  • Biostatistics
  • Statistical Analysis

Background:

  • Exploratory data analysis in medicine often involves numerous hypothesis tests for risk factors.
  • Controlling the overall false positive rate is crucial due to multiple testing.
  • The Bonferroni adjustment can be overly conservative with correlated tests.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose an exact adjustment method for multiple hypothesis testing.
  • To address limitations of the Bonferroni adjustment with correlated variables.
  • To provide a statistically sound method for analyzing single features at a time with limited sample sizes.

Main Methods:

  • Developing an exact adjustment based on joint permutational distributions of test statistics.
  • Applying the method in scenarios with limited sample sizes allowing single-feature analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Validating the proposed method with two distinct medical research examples.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed exact adjustment method provides a less conservative approach compared to Bonferroni.
    • Demonstrated applicability in medical research settings with correlated risk factors.
    • The method is suitable for situations with small sample sizes and single-feature analysis.

    Conclusions:

    • The novel exact adjustment method offers improved statistical power for identifying prognostic variables.
    • This approach is particularly beneficial in medical research where multiple risk factors are common.
    • The method provides a viable alternative to traditional adjustments like Bonferroni for correlated data.