Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

A Reversible, Non-invasive Method for Airway Resistance Measurements and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Sampling in Mice
Published on: April 13, 2010
Is the duration of mechanical ventilation predictable?
1Département d' Anesthésie, Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, CHU Paris-Sud, Clamart, France. jfZazzo.beclere@invivo.edu
Background:
Prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV) is associated with high morbidity, mortality, and cost. However, few and limited data are available on the prediction of duration of MV. We conducted an observational cohort study to seek predictive criteria.
Methods:
The study was performed in a surgical ICU (SICU) in a university hospital. One hundred ninety-five consecutive unselected patients and 203 episodes of MV were prospectively analyzed to determine if clinical features, physiologic parameters, or multifactor scoring systems, at the time of admission or intubation, could be used as predictors of MV > or = 15 days. A univariate statistical analysis and a multiple logistic regression were used. A prospective validation study was then conducted to determine the accuracy of the results.
Results:
(1) Univariate statistical analysis indicated that SICU length of stay, emergent endotracheal intubation as opposed to elective intubation, indication for MV, sepsis score at the time of admission and intubation, lung injury score (LIS) at the time of admission and intubation, number of organ system failures at the time of admission and intubation, and serum albumin concentration were significantly different between the two groups. (2) Only the circumstances (emergency) of endotracheal intubation (odds ratio [OR]=3.5, p=0.02) and the LIS (OR=3.7, p=0.004) independently predicted a duration of endotracheal intubation > or = 15 days. One hundred twenty-eight consecutive patients requiring emergent intubation and MV were included in the prospective validation. The accuracy of the LIS > or = 1 used to predict MV > or = 15 days was as follows: sensitivity=0.88; specificity=0.28; positive predictive value=0.24; negative predictive value=0.91.
Conclusion:
Low incidence of MV > or = 15 days was observed (13% and 20%, respectively, in observational cohort study and validation study) in unselected SICU patients. LIS > or = 1 at the time of intubation provides excellent negative predictive value (0.93 and 0.91) of duration of MV > or = 15 days. These data suggest that tracheotomy should not be considered for patients with LIS < 1.
Insights
Predicting prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV) is crucial. The Lung Injury Score (LIS) at intubation effectively identifies patients unlikely to require MV for 15 days or more, aiding clinical decisions.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Respiratory Therapy
- Surgical Intensive Care
Background:
- Prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV) is linked to increased patient morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs.
- Limited data exist on predicting the duration of MV, highlighting a need for better predictive tools.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify clinical and physiological predictors for mechanical ventilation exceeding or equaling 15 days.
- To evaluate the accuracy of these predictors in an unselected surgical ICU population.
Main Methods:
- An observational cohort study in a surgical ICU prospectively analyzed 203 episodes of MV.
- Clinical features, physiological parameters, and scoring systems at admission/intubation were assessed.
- Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed, followed by a prospective validation study.
Main Results:
- Emergent intubation and a Lung Injury Score (LIS) ≥ 1 independently predicted MV duration of ≥ 15 days.
- The LIS demonstrated a high negative predictive value (0.91-0.93) for prolonged MV.
- A low incidence of prolonged MV (13-20%) was observed in the studied patient cohorts.
Conclusions:
- LIS ≥ 1 at intubation is a valuable negative predictor for prolonged mechanical ventilation.
- This finding suggests that tracheotomy may not be indicated for patients with an LIS < 1.
- The study provides evidence to guide clinical decisions regarding the management of ventilated patients.
Related Concept Videos
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV)
Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management

