Solid-phase microextraction with capillary gas-liquid chromatography and nitrogen-phosphorus selective detection for...

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) was tested as a sample preparation for the simultaneous assay of ten antidepressant drugs and metabolites (TADs) in human plasma. Aqueous NaOH (0.5 ml, 1 M) and chloramitriptyline (50 microliters, 40 micrograms/ml) as internal standard (I.S.) were added to a 2-ml plasma sample. This mixture was extracted with a 100-micron polydimethylsiloxane SPME fiber (Supelco) for 10 min. After washing in water and methanol (50%) and subsequent drying at room temperature, desorption of the fiber was performed in the injection port of a gas chromatograph at 260 degrees C for 1 min (HP 5890, DB-17 30 m x 0.25 mm I.D., 0.25 micron capillary; 0.7 ml/min nitrogen; nitrogen-phosphorus selective detection). The recovery was found to be very low from plasma (0.3% to 0.8%) but considerably higher from water (about 15%). Therefore, the high protein binding of antidepressants appears to be the main limiting mechanism for a better extraction. However, the analytes were well separated and the calibrations were linear between 125 ng/ml and 2000 ng/ml. The limits of quantification were about 90 ng/ml for imipramine and desipramine, 125 ng/ml for amitriptyline, trimipramine, doxepine, nortriptyline and mianserine and about 200 ng/ml for maprotiline, clomipramine and desmethylclomipramine. The recovery was improved by increasing the extraction time. The influence of the concentrations of the sum of proteins and of alpha-acid glycoprotein on the peak-area ratios ATAD/A I.S. and on absolute peak areas was studied. Peak-area ratios increased with decreasing protein concentration but were found to be independent on alpha-acid glycoprotein. A simple model for the explanation of the effect is presented. Measures for the improvement of sensitivity are discussed. As presented in this paper, which first describes SPME for the analysis of drugs in plasma, SPME with a short extraction time can be of only very limited value for therapeutic drug monitoring. Lower concentrations than the limit of quantification are usually found at therapeutic doses. The method can be useful for toxicological analysis after the accidental or suicidal intake of higher doses. However, an about 10-fold improvement of the sensitivity of the method seems to be possible.