Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Subjective assessment of acute tinnitus and proposal of a tinnitus score].

Laryngo- rhino- otologie·2003
Same author

[Distortion products of otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) in acute tinnitus aurium].

Laryngo- rhino- otologie·2000
Same author

[Tobacco smoking and hearing in the elderly. Can presbycusis be prevented by smoking cessation?].

HNO·1999
Same author

[Is there a correlation between sudden deafness and smoking?].

Laryngo- rhino- otologie·1998
Same author

Experiences with laser surgery in benign and malignant findings of the oro- and hypopharynx.

Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology·1995
Same author

[Communication and noise. Speech intelligibility of airplane pilots with and without active noise compensation].

HNO·1994

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
09:06

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

[Implantable bone conduction hearing aids]

R G Matschke1

  • 1Aus der Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Klinik, Klinikums Schwerin, Deutschland.

Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

Partly implantable bone conduction hearing aids offer improved audiological and cosmetic outcomes compared to conventional devices. Clinical experiences show percutaneous systems provide superior hearing gain and patient acceptance.

Area of Science:

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Audiology

Background:

  • Conventional external bone conduction hearing aids can cause retroauricular pain and feedback issues.
  • Existing devices often present cosmetic concerns for users.
  • Technical and audiological limitations hinder the effectiveness of traditional bone conduction aids.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate partly implantable bone conduction hearing aid systems.
  • To address the limitations of conventional bone conduction hearing aids.
  • To compare transcutaneous and percutaneous implantable systems.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of two distinct partly implantable bone conduction hearing aid systems.
  • Inclusion of both transcutaneous and percutaneous system designs.

More Related Videos

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
04:32

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention

Published on: December 20, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
09:06

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
04:32

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention

Published on: December 20, 2024

  • Clinical experience-based evaluation of system performance.

    • Main Results:

    • Partly implantable systems were designed to overcome conventional aid problems.
    • The percutaneous system demonstrated advantages over the transcutaneous system.
    • Objective hearing gain and patient acceptance were superior with the percutaneous system.

    Conclusions:

    • Partly implantable bone conduction hearing aids offer significant improvements.
    • Percutaneous systems are recommended for enhanced audiological and cosmetic results.
    • Patient acceptance and hearing outcomes favor the percutaneous implantable approach.