Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Implantable bone conduction hearing aids]

R G Matschke1

  • 1Aus der Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Klinik, Klinikums Schwerin, Deutschland.

Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Subjective assessment of acute tinnitus and proposal of a tinnitus score].

Laryngo- rhino- otologie·2003
Same author

[Distortion products of otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) in acute tinnitus aurium].

Laryngo- rhino- otologie·2000
Same author

[Tobacco smoking and hearing in the elderly. Can presbycusis be prevented by smoking cessation?].

HNO·1999
Same author

[Is there a correlation between sudden deafness and smoking?].

Laryngo- rhino- otologie·1998
Same author

Experiences with laser surgery in benign and malignant findings of the oro- and hypopharynx.

Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology·1995
Same author

[Communication and noise. Speech intelligibility of airplane pilots with and without active noise compensation].

HNO·1994
Same journal

Necrotizing fasciitis of the thigh-a devastating sign of intestinal perforation.

Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2026
Same journal

Regenerative therapies in rehabilitation with interfaces with occupational medicine, geriatrics, and oncology: the example of extracorporeal shock wave therapy.

Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2026
Same journal

Cerebral toxoplasmosis in patients with peripheral B-cell lymphoma : A case series and a literature review.

Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2026
Same journal

Post-pandemic rebound of rotavirus and adenovirus in pediatric gastroenteritis: a 6-year antigen-based surveillance study from Turkey.

Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2026
Same journal

Neuroaxis involvement in Chikungunya virus infection: a retrospective case series.

Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2026
Same journal

A complicated case of a spinal Scedosporium apiospermum infection with a favorable outcome-case report.

Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2026
See all related articles

Partly implantable bone conduction hearing aids offer improved audiological and cosmetic outcomes compared to conventional devices. Clinical experiences show percutaneous systems provide superior hearing gain and patient acceptance.

Area of Science:

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Audiology

Background:

  • Conventional external bone conduction hearing aids can cause retroauricular pain and feedback issues.
  • Existing devices often present cosmetic concerns for users.
  • Technical and audiological limitations hinder the effectiveness of traditional bone conduction aids.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate partly implantable bone conduction hearing aid systems.
  • To address the limitations of conventional bone conduction hearing aids.
  • To compare transcutaneous and percutaneous implantable systems.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of two distinct partly implantable bone conduction hearing aid systems.
  • Inclusion of both transcutaneous and percutaneous system designs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Clinical experience-based evaluation of system performance.
  • Main Results:

    • Partly implantable systems were designed to overcome conventional aid problems.
    • The percutaneous system demonstrated advantages over the transcutaneous system.
    • Objective hearing gain and patient acceptance were superior with the percutaneous system.

    Conclusions:

    • Partly implantable bone conduction hearing aids offer significant improvements.
    • Percutaneous systems are recommended for enhanced audiological and cosmetic results.
    • Patient acceptance and hearing outcomes favor the percutaneous implantable approach.