Related Experiment Videos
[Clinical course of superficial transitional carcinoma of the bladder without poor prognostic factors]
M Arrizabalaga Moreno1, M Castro Pita, J M Díez Rodríguez
1Servicio de Urología, Hospital de Móstoles, Madrid.
Objectives:
Surface carcinoma of the bladder shows a high incidence of tumour recurrence that require frequent examinations associated to potential morbidity. This paper analyses our series of patients with vesical tumours with no known unfavourable clinical prognostic factors, aiming to detect low risk groups where it may be feasible to change the usual follow-up criteria.
Material And Methods:
Between 1983 and 1996, 503 patients with vesical cancer, 388 of which 388 were primarily surface tumours, were monitored. The study analyzed 24 patients with surface transitional carcinoma with no unfavourable prognostic factor, i.e. Ta tumours, grade 1, single, under 1 cm, negative urine cytology and multiple negative vesical biopsies. This group was then compared to a control group comprising all other patients with surface tumours in our series (364 patients), and the prognostic factors were assessed based on the disease-free interval, progression-free interval, and overall and tumour-specific survival. Also the recurrence-free interval from the first endoscopic control at 3 months after transurethral resection, were studied according to Parmar's criteria.
Results:
With a mean follow-up of 53 months, 37% patients in the study group have relapsed versus 41% in the control group (n = 0.9), after 2 years on average. Actuarial curves in the control group reveal statistical significance for higher degree tumours recurrence. No grade progression has occurred in the study group versus 9% in the control group. No patient evolved to T2 versus 5% in the control group; also in this group, 5% patients died because of their tumour versus none in the study group. The 24 patients in the study belong to group 1 in Parmar's low risk, while the remainder of patients in the control group ranked according to these criteria have demonstrated an unfavourable statistical significance (p < 0.01) in patients with early relapse.
Conclusions:
Good results obtained in the evolution of patients with surface tumours with no unfavourable prognostic factors are due to the strict monitoring they undergo in order to detect early relapses. However, 37% of recurrences in this group does not allow to modify the usual follow-up schedule. In our experience, Parmar's criteria does not contribute any benefit over classical criteria to evaluate prognostic factors in surface vesical cancer.