Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
Published on: May 6, 2021
To randomise or not to randomise: methodological pitfalls of the RCT design in psychosocial intervention studies
1Cancer Support Centre, Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK. Andrewbot@Compuserve.com
Abstract:
We are seeing evidence of more studies investigating the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions of cancer patients, predominantly within groups. As roles within cancer and palliative care diversify, specially trained nurses and other health care workers are taking a more active role within psychosocial intervention studies. Frequently, these studies are randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Often, the results of these psychosocial RCTs have been laid open to general criticisms of design, implementation and reporting. The following paper focuses specifically on the general and experimenter problems in conducting RCTs within psychosocial interventions. It highlights the limitations and inherent problems seen with RCTs of psychosocial interventions so that health care workers are aware of these before considering undertaking psychosocial RCTs with cancer patients.
Related Concept Videos
Group Design
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Blinding
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
