Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Specialties and the specialty boards

W D Holden

    The Laryngoscope
    |June 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The fragmented nature of medical professional organizations hinders unified policy development. Establishing cohesive national policies is crucial for maintaining private sector leadership in medicine and demonstrating public accountability.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Arteriosclerosis obliterans of the abdominal aorta.

    Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1920)·2010
    Same author

    Arteriosclerotic ischemic necrosis of the lower extremities.

    Surgery·2010
    Same author

    Treatment of deep venous thrombosis with reference to subcutaneous injection of heparin and use of dicumarol.

    Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1920)·2010
    Same author

    Morning panel discussion.

    Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine·2009
    Same author

    A vigorous leader (R.M. Zollinger).

    American journal of surgery·1986
    Same author

    The quality of surgical clerkships.

    Surgery·1985

    Area of Science:

    • Medical professional organizations
    • Healthcare policy
    • Graduate medical education

    Background:

    • Specialty societies and boards have independently set standards for care and education.
    • A lack of cohesive, integrated efforts exists among national medical organizations.
    • Federal government interest and regulation in healthcare and medical education are increasing.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the fragmentation within organized medicine.
    • To examine the implications of federal regulation on the medical profession.
    • To highlight the need for unified national policies in healthcare.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of the structure and function of medical professional organizations.
    • Review of legislative trends impacting the healthcare industry.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of new coordinating bodies for medical education.

    • Main Results:

    • Multiple independent specialty organizations lack unified policy development.
    • Federal regulations are increasing bureaucratic control over physicians.
    • New agencies like the Coordinating Council on Medical Education are attempts at integration and accountability.

    Conclusions:

    • The pluralistic structure of organized medicine is self-defeating without cohesive policies.
    • Unified national policies are essential for medicine to retain leadership in the private sector.
    • Developing cohesive national policies is a critical, ongoing process for public accountability.