Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Statistical methods in computational anatomy

M Miller1, A Banerjee, G Christensen

  • 1Department of Electrical Engineering, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri 63130, USA. mim@cis.wustl.edu

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|October 27, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CT scanning of middle ear cholesteatoma: what does the surgeon want to know?

The British journal of radiology·2002
Same author

First crystallographic signature of amyloid-like fibril forming beta-sheet assemblage from a tripeptide with non-coded amino acids.

Chemical communications (Cambridge, England)·2002
Same author

Audit of stapedectomy results in a district general hospital.

Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·2002
Same author

Coronary artery disease and its problems in management.

Journal of the Indian Medical Association·2002
Same author

Leucopenia in adult polycystic kidney disease patients on haemodialysis.

Nephron·2002
Same author

Traditional healers and their practices in Malawi.

Tropical doctor·2002
Same journal

A joint model for a longitudinal outcome and a progressive multistate model under a mixed observation scheme.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Efficient semi-supervised estimation of optimal individualized treatment regimes with survival outcome.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Asymptotic online FWER control for dependent test statistics.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Regression analysis of misclassified current status data with potentially unknown test accuracy.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Bayesian multivariate linear mixed-effects models with varied association structures.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Inference about the ratio of age-standardized rates between two overlapping populations.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces methods for analyzing anatomical shape variation using computational anatomy. Researchers developed techniques to model brain shape differences, aiding in understanding anatomical variability.

Area of Science:

  • Computational anatomy
  • Medical image analysis
  • Biomedical engineering

Background:

  • Computational anatomy is an emerging field for studying anatomical shape.
  • Existing methods often assume small deformations for anatomical variation analysis.
  • Probabilistic modeling of anatomical variation is crucial for understanding biological differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent developments in computational anatomy for anatomical shape analysis.
  • To formulate empirical procedures for generating covariance operators for anatomical variation.
  • To develop methods for estimating covariances of vector fields on manifolds.

Main Methods:

  • Mapping populations of brains to common coordinate systems to construct templates.
Keywords:
Non-programmatic

Related Experiment Videos

  • Estimating mean and covariances of Gaussian measures directly from template-to-target maps.
  • Utilizing generalized spectrum estimation for vector field covariances.
  • Employing small deformation linear operators for parametric covariance estimation.

    • Main Results:

    • Developed a framework for empirical generation of covariance operators for anatomical variation.
    • Demonstrated methods for estimating population-based anatomical variation using Gaussian measures.
    • Showcased techniques for analyzing variation in one-, two-, and three-dimensional manifolds like sulci, surfaces, and brain volumes.
    • Introduced parametric covariance estimation analogous to autoregressive modeling.

    Conclusions:

    • The presented methods provide a robust approach to modeling anatomical variation within computational anatomy.
    • These techniques enable the quantification and analysis of shape differences in complex anatomical structures.
    • The study contributes to the advancement of computational anatomy through novel statistical modeling techniques.