Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Computer-assisted nCPAP settings in comparison with conventional methods]

M Hoster1, E Schlenker, K H Rühle

  • 1Klinik Ambrock, Klinik für Pneumologie, Hagen.

Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany)
|August 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[When patients bring their own medical devices into hospital - position paper of the German Society for Sleep Research and Sleep Medicine, Section 8 of the German Society of Pneumology and the Association of Pneumological hospitals].

Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2015
Same author

[Positional paper of the German working group "cardiopulmonary exercise testing" to ventilatory and metabolic (lactate) thresholds].

Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2013
Same author

[Technique and clinical importance of breathing wave generators].

Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany)·2012
Same author

Obstructive pressure peak: a new method for differentiation of obstructive and central apneas under auto-CPAP therapy.

Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung·2012
Same author

[Detection of daytime sleepiness using Epworth Sleepiness Scale and a 3-item questionnaire in obstructive sleep apnea].

Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany)·2012
Same author

[Telemedicine and training in COPD].

Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany)·2011

Constant CPAP is preferred for obstructive sleep apnea, but automated CPAP offers an alternative for those intolerant to high pressures. Automated systems showed a trend toward more events but comparable sleep quality.

Area of Science:

  • Sleep Medicine
  • Respiratory Physiology

Background:

  • Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is commonly treated with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP).
  • Automated CPAP systems aim to optimize pressure titration based on respiratory patterns, including inspiratory flow shape for early obstruction detection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of automated CPAP titration (Autoset-CPAP) with conventional constant CPAP in patients with OSA.
  • To evaluate the impact of both methods on respiratory events and sleep quality.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized cross-over study involving 12 patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.
  • Two polysomnographies were conducted: one with conventional constant CPAP and another with Autoset-CPAP.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Both methods effectively reduced apneas, hypopneas, and snoring.
  • Autoset-CPAP showed a higher number of apneas/hypopneas (30.14 ± 17.6) compared to constant CPAP (7.9 ± 11.2, p < 0.01).
  • No significant differences were observed in sleeping time, sleep efficiency, arousals, or sleep stages between the two methods.

Conclusions:

  • Constant CPAP remains the primary treatment for patients who tolerate high pressures.
  • Automated CPAP provides a viable alternative for patients experiencing pressure intolerance, particularly those who might otherwise require BiLevel CPAP.