Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The trouble with cognitive subtraction

K J Friston1, C J Price, P Fletcher

  • 1Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.

Neuroimage
|October 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Generalised random tessellation stratified sampling over auxiliary spaces.

Journal of applied statistics·2025
Same author

Four Functionally Distinct Regions in the Left Supramarginal Gyrus Support Word Processing.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2016
Same author

Neural changes in the primate brain correlated with the evolution of complex motor skills.

Scientific reports·2016
Same author

Multiwavelength interferometry system for the Orion laser facility.

Applied optics·2016
Same author

Respiratory sinus arrhythmia as a potential measure in substance use treatment--outcome studies.

Addiction (Abingdon, England)·2015
Same author

An in-vacuo optical levitation trap for high-intensity laser interaction experiments with isolated microtargets.

The Review of scientific instruments·2015

Pure insertion, an assumption in cognitive subtraction, is critiqued for its invalidity in neuronal processes. Factorial designs are superior for cognitive neuroanatomy, revealing interactions between cognitive components.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroimaging

Background:

  • Critiques the 'pure insertion' assumption common in cognitive subtraction paradigms.
  • Highlights that pure insertion posits no interactions between cognitive components during neural processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge the validity of the pure insertion assumption in cognitive neuroscience.
  • To propose factorial designs as a more powerful alternative to subtraction methods for studying cognitive neuroanatomy.

Main Methods:

  • Employs factorial experimental designs to explicitly test for interactions between cognitive components.
  • Contrasts the analytical power of factorial designs with traditional subtraction methods.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrates that inferotemporal activations in object recognition are modulated by phonological retrieval.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Shows that interactions, not just main effects, are crucial for characterizing cognitive neuroanatomy.
  • Reveals that phonological retrieval implicates inferotemporal regions during object naming, even without direct activation.

    • Conclusions:

    • Pure insertion is not a valid assumption for understanding the neural basis of cognition.
    • Factorial designs offer a more comprehensive approach to cognitive neuroanatomy by assessing both main effects and interactions.
    • Cognitive neuroanatomy requires characterizing both regionally specific activations and regionally specific interactions for a complete understanding.