Related Experiment Videos
Side effects of chiropractic treatment: a prospective study
C Leboeuf-Yde1, B Hennius, E Rudberg
1Nordic Institute for Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Odense, Denmark.
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
|November 5, 1997
Summary
Spinal manipulation side effects are common but generally mild and short-lived, with local discomfort being most frequent. These reactions are largely predictable and appear physiological.
Area of Science:
- Chiropractic care
- Manual therapy
- Adverse events research
Background:
- Understanding patient responses to spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is crucial for clinical practice.
- Previous studies have characterized SMT side effects, but further investigation is needed to confirm these findings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if the characteristics of unpleasant side effects following spinal manipulative therapy align with those identified in prior research.
- To provide a comprehensive overview of common and uncommon reactions to chiropractic SMT.
Main Methods:
- A prospective interview survey was conducted using standard questionnaires.
- Data were collected from 66 Swedish chiropractic practices, involving 625 patients across 1858 recorded visits.
- Patients self-reported unpleasant reactions, including onset time, duration, and symptom severity following spinal manipulation.
Main Results:
- Reactions to spinal manipulation are common, benign, and typically resolve within 24 hours post-treatment.
- The most frequent reactions include local discomfort (two-thirds of cases), followed by non-local pain, fatigue, or headache (10% each).
- Nausea, dizziness, and other reactions are infrequent (<5%). Reactions are more common in women and at the start of treatment series, particularly for patients with chronic issues.
Conclusions:
- Common and uncommon reactions to chiropractic spinal manipulation have been identified.
- These reactions are largely predictable and appear to be predominantly physiological in nature.
- The findings support the safety profile of SMT when considering patient-reported outcomes.