Monoclonal antibodies against eosinophils in liver allograft rejection

There has been recent interest in eosinophils as a histological diagnostic marker of liver allograft rejection. However, the reliability of counting eosinophils in sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) has not been evaluated previously. We quantified eosinophils in 10 day-5 protocol liver biopsy specimens in 10 patients. The control groups were 5 patients with cytomegalovirus infection, 5 patients with obscure liver dysfunction, and 6 patients with HCV infection. Eosinophil count was assessed using H&E and by specific monoclonal antibody staining using (1) an anti-ECP antibody (EG2) and (2) a monoclonal antibody against human eosinophil major basic protein (MBP) (BMK-13). The average percentage of the total inflammatory infiltrate of eosinophils in portal tracts was 9% in the moderate to severe rejection group as compared with 0.25% in the mild rejection group (P < .001) and 0% in the control group (P < .001). The eosinophil count decreased markedly after successful treatment of rejection. The H&E staining correlated with MBP+ the (BMK-13 immunoreactive) cells but were more numerous with BMK-13. BMK-13 also stained significantly more cells when compared with EG2 (P < .01). This difference may be because EG2 staining only activated eosinophils, whereas BMK-13 is a pan-eosinophilic maker, regardless of activation. This study confirms that eosinophils are a specific feature of acute cellular rejection and are an aid to its diagnosis. BMK-13 is a useful pan-eosinophilic marker that is more efficient in obtaining eosinophil count when compared with H&E.