Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Individual differences in susceptibility to the "irrelevant speech effect"

W Ellermeier1, K Zimmer

  • 1Institut für Psychologie der Universität Regensburg, Germany. wolfgang.ellermeier@psychologie.uni-regensburg.de

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|February 12, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of diet composition and temperature-humidity index on water and dry matter intake of high-yielding dairy cows.

Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition·2017
Same author

In-process measuring of the electrical shunt resistance of laser-scribed thin-film stacks by nested circular scribes.

The Review of scientific instruments·2013
Same author

Intracerebral haemorrhage in a population-based stroke registry (LuSSt): incidence, aetiology, functional outcome and mortality.

Journal of neurology·2013
Same author

The influence of general anxiety and childbirth-specific anxiety on birth outcome.

Archives of women's mental health·2013
Same author

Sub-wavelength ripples in fused silica after irradiation of the solid/liquid interface with ultrashort laser pulses.

Nanotechnology·2011
Same author

Characterization of pseudorabies virus of wild boar origin from Europe.

Epidemiology and infection·2010

Individual differences in how noise affects performance, specifically irrelevant speech effects, are normally distributed and can be reliably measured. However, self-reported noise sensitivity poorly predicts objective performance changes.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Auditory Perception
  • Human Performance

Background:

  • Noise significantly impacts cognitive performance, but the extent of this impact varies greatly among individuals.
  • Understanding individual differences in noise susceptibility is crucial for optimizing work and learning environments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the distribution, temporal stability, and measurement precision of individual differences in objective noise effects on performance.
  • To investigate the relationship between objectively measured noise effects and self-reported noise susceptibility.

Main Methods:

  • Seventy-two participants performed a memory task under three auditory conditions: foreign speech, pink noise, and silence.
  • Individual irrelevant speech effects were calculated as the difference in recall errors between speech and silence conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Retest reliability and internal consistency were assessed; self-report questionnaires on noise sensitivity were also administered.

    • Main Results:

    • Individual differences in irrelevant speech effects were normally distributed, ranging from facilitation to disruption.
    • Retest reliability for individual differences was moderate (rtt = 0.45), with internal consistency at alpha = 0.55.
    • Objective performance decrements due to noise were reliably measured, but self-reported noise sensitivity showed weak correlations with objective effects, particularly in males.

    Conclusions:

    • Objective performance decrements in the irrelevant speech paradigm can be reliably measured.
    • Self-assessment of noise impact and general noise sensitivity are poor predictors of objective performance changes.
    • The relationship between objective and subjective measures of noise effects is complex and gender-dependent.