Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement

L H Cohn1, D H Adams, G S Couper

  • 1The Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
|November 14, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Update on: a meta-analysis of sperm donation offspring health outcomes - 2018 update.

Journal of developmental origins of health and disease·2018
Same author

Low-dose interleukin-2 promotes STAT-5 phosphorylation, T<sub>reg</sub> survival and CTLA-4-dependent function in autoimmune liver diseases.

Clinical and experimental immunology·2017
Same author

A meta-analysis of sperm donation offspring health outcomes.

Journal of developmental origins of health and disease·2016
Same author

A meta-analysis of neonatal health outcomes from oocyte donation.

Journal of developmental origins of health and disease·2015
Same author

Flightless I is a key regulator of the fibroproliferative process in hypertrophic scarring and a target for a novel antiscarring therapy.

The British journal of dermatology·2015
Same author

Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients Who Undergo Transfer to the Adult Healthcare Service Have Good Long-Term Outcomes.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2015
Same journal

A Systematic Review on the Impact of Postoperative Rehabilitation Programs in Thoracic Surgery Patients.

Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Endoscopic vs. Operative Management of Acute Esophageal Perforation: A 21-Year Experience at a High-Volume Referral Center.

Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Valved Sano Conduit During the Norwood Procedure: A Contemporary Review of Early Outcomes, Reintervention Burden, and Pulmonary Artery Growth.

Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Modified Konno Procedure and Transaortic Septal Myectomy in Children With Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction.

Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Post-Operative Hemothorax: Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery vs Thoracotomy-Analysis of Outcomes and Costs.

Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Palliative Care Throughout the Entire Perioperative Pathway in Cardiovascular Surgery.

Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2026
See all related articles

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement offers reliable symptom relief and survival benefits for patients with aortic valve disease. This approach reduces surgical trauma, improves patient satisfaction, and speeds recovery compared to traditional open surgery.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures
  • Aortic Valve Disease

Background:

  • Aortic valve replacement is a standard treatment for aortic stenosis and regurgitation.
  • Traditional open surgery provides reliable outcomes but involves significant patient trauma.
  • Minimally invasive techniques aim to reduce surgical impact while maintaining efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the outcomes of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement.
  • To compare the benefits of minimally invasive versus open aortic valve replacement.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing minimally invasive surgical techniques for aortic valve replacement.
  • Employing cardiopulmonary bypass during the procedure.
  • Comparing outcomes with traditional open-chest surgery.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement demonstrates comparable quality to open surgery.
  • Patients experience reduced surgical trauma, blood use, and operative dissection.
  • Early and medium-term results show decreased pain, enhanced patient satisfaction, and improved mobility.

Conclusions:

  • Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement is a safe and effective alternative.
  • This approach leads to faster recovery and potentially lower healthcare costs.
  • Improved patient-reported outcomes and functional recovery are key benefits.