Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interobserver variability in grading lumbar fusions

C L Hamill1, E D Simmons

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, State University of New York, Buffalo, USA.

Journal of Spinal Disorders
|November 14, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Changes in the length of office visits.

The New England journal of medicine·2001
Same author

Surgical treatment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with associated scoliosis.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2001
Same author

Cervical deformity: rationale for selecting the appropriate fusion technique (anterior, posterior, and 360 degree).

The Orthopedic clinics of North America·1998
Same author

Thoracic and lumbar deformity: rationale for selecting the appropriate fusion technique (Anterior, posterior, and 360 degree).

The Orthopedic clinics of North America·1998
Same author

Neurogenic motor evoked potentials: a prospective comparison of stimulation methods in spinal deformity surgery.

Journal of spinal disorders·1998
Same author

Posterior arthrodesis in the skeletally immature patient. Assessing the risk for crankshaft: is an open triradiate cartilage the answer?

Spine·1997
Same journal

Technical note. Pyogenic spinal epidural abscess: a minimally invasive technique for multisegmental decompression.

Journal of spinal disorders·2001
Same journal

The use of neostigmine to treat postoperative ileus in orthopedic spinal patients.

Journal of spinal disorders·2001
Same journal

Anterior/posterior lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of complications and predictive factors.

Journal of spinal disorders·2001
Same journal

Radiographic characteristics on conventional radiographs after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparative study between radiotranslucent and radiopaque cages.

Journal of spinal disorders·2001
Same journal

Predictors of functional outcome in elderly patients undergoing posterior lumbar spine surgery.

Journal of spinal disorders·2001
Same journal

Early course and long-term follow-up after automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy.

Journal of spinal disorders·2001
See all related articles

Radiographic assessment of lumbar fusion shows fair agreement between observers. Experienced surgeons demonstrated better reproducibility, suggesting variability in grading may impact reported fusion rates and clinical outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Radiology
  • Spine Surgery

Background:

  • Assessing lumbar fusion status radiographically is crucial for evaluating surgical outcomes.
  • Noninstrumented lumbar fusions are common procedures, but their radiographic assessment can be challenging.
  • Variability in interpreting fusion status may affect reported success rates and clinical correlations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate interobserver variability in grading lumbar fusion status.
  • To assess intraobserver reproducibility among surgeons with varying experience levels.
  • To determine the reliability of radiographic assessment for noninstrumented lumbar fusions.

Main Methods:

  • Fifty sets of lumbar spine radiographs (AP, bending, flexion-extension views) were analyzed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Six observers with diverse experience graded the fusion status of two-level noninstrumented lumbar fusions.
  • Kappa statistical analysis was employed to quantify interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility.

    • Main Results:

    • Interobserver agreement for grading lumbar fusion status was found to be only fair.
    • Intraobserver reproducibility was higher among more experienced observers.
    • Radiographic assessment demonstrated fair reliability in terms of interobserver agreement.

    Conclusions:

    • There is significant interobserver variability in the radiographic grading of lumbar fusion status.
    • Surgeon experience influences the reproducibility of fusion assessment.
    • This variability may contribute to discrepancies in reported fusion rates and the correlation between radiographic and clinical outcomes.