Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Construct validity of the computerized version of the Category Test

S G Berger1, J T Chibnall, J D Gfeller

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Missouri-St. Louis 63121, USA.

Journal of Clinical Psychology
|November 14, 1997
PubMed
Summary

The computerized Category Test (CT) demonstrates strong construct validity, mirroring the standard version's performance. This finding supports its use in neuropsychological assessments, regardless of administration method.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Malnutrition and morbidity among children not reached by the national vitamin A capsule programme in urban slum areas of Indonesia.

Public health·2008
Same author

Internist judgments of chronic low back pain.

Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)·2004
Same author

Effects of coaching on detecting feigned cognitive impairment with the Category test.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2003
Same author

Experiments on distant intercessory prayer: God, science, and the lesson of Massah.

Archives of internal medicine·2001
Same author

Religion in the clinic: the role of physician beliefs.

Southern medical journal·2001
Same author

Pain assessment in cognitively impaired and unimpaired older adults: a comparison of four scales.

Pain·2001

Area of Science:

  • Neuropsychology
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • The Category Test (CT) is a widely used measure in neuropsychological assessment.
  • Evaluating the construct validity of computerized versions of traditional tests is crucial for modern practice.
  • Previous research has established the psychometric properties of the standard CT.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the construct validity of the computerized Category Test (CT) compared to its standard paper-and-pencil version.
  • To determine if the computerized CT measures the same underlying cognitive abilities as the standard CT.
  • To provide evidence for the reliability and validity of the computerized CT for clinical use.

Main Methods:

  • Outpatient rehabilitation clients completed either the standard CT (n=49) or the computerized CT (n=56) as part of a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Two principal component factor analyses were conducted on the data from both versions of the CT.
  • The resulting factor structures were compared to each other and to a previously published factor analysis of the standard CT.

    • Main Results:

    • Factor loadings showed a high degree of similarity between the computerized CT group and the standard CT group.
    • The factor structures obtained were comparable to a previously reported analysis in the literature.
    • Both versions of the CT loaded onto a common factor interpreted as "spatial abilities".

    Conclusions:

    • The computerized Category Test (CT) exhibits strong construct validity, comparable to the standard version.
    • The mode of administration (computerized vs. standard) does not significantly alter the underlying cognitive constructs measured by the CT.
    • The findings support the use of the computerized CT as a valid component of comprehensive neuropsychological test batteries.