Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ethical issues in long-term psychiatric management

D Dickenson1

  • 1Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London.

Journal of Medical Ethics
|November 14, 1997
PubMed
Summary

Long-term psychiatric care presents ethical challenges regarding involuntary treatment consent and preventive detention. Legal frameworks must address these issues, balancing patient rights with public safety concerns.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ethical issues in limb transplants.

Bioethics·2001
Same author

Audit of deep wound infection following hip fracture surgery.

Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh·2000
Same author

Ethical issues in limb transplants.

Postgraduate medical journal·2000
Same author

The Bournewood judgment: a way forward?

Medicine, science, and the law·1999
Same author

The capacity to make decisions in dementia: some contemporary issues.

International journal of geriatric psychiatry·1999
Same author

Abortion, relationship, and property in labor: a clinical case study.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·1999

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry
  • Medical Ethics
  • Mental Health Law

Background:

  • Long-term psychiatric care highlights two key ethical dilemmas.
  • Previous legislation addressed involuntary treatment consent with time limits.
  • Current long-term care provisions lack these time limits, raising consent issues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine ethical problems in long-term psychiatric care.
  • To analyze the justification for compulsory treatment without explicit consent.
  • To explore the moral implications of risk assessment in preventive detention.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of two anonymized case studies from clinical practice.
  • Analysis of ethical issues within the context of current mental health legislation.
  • Examination of legal principles concerning preventive detention and risk assessment.

Main Results:

  • Compulsory treatment and supervision in long-term care raise significant ethical questions regarding consent.
  • Detaining potentially dangerous individuals without prior criminal offenses hinges on risk assessment, introducing moral luck.
  • The justification for involuntary treatment becomes more problematic without legislative time constraints.

Conclusions:

  • Long-term care necessitates a re-evaluation of ethical frameworks for involuntary treatment.
  • Risk assessment in psychiatry involves moral considerations of luck and responsibility.
  • Balancing patient autonomy with public safety remains a critical challenge in mental health services.
Keywords:
Mental Health Act 1983 (Great Britain)Mental Health TherapiesProfessional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos