Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Nuisance concerns and odor control

J R Miner1

  • 1Bioresource Engineering Department, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331, USA.

Journal of Dairy Science
|November 15, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Electrical effect on probe wounds after long time exposure with a new generation conducted electrical weapon (Taser T10®) on human volunteers.

Forensic science, medicine, and pathology·2025
Same author

THE GROWTH OF CUCUMIS MELO SEEDLINGS AT DIFFERENT TEMPERATURES.

The Journal of general physiology·2009
Same author

Bispectral electroencephalogram analysis of pharmacologically paralyzed patients in the emergency department.

Annals of emergency medicine·2004
Same author

Presentation, time to antibiotics, and mortality of patients with bacterial meningitis at an urban county medical center.

The Journal of emergency medicine·2001
Same author

Droperidol vs. prochlorperazine for benign headaches in the emergency department.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine·2001
Same author

Alternatives to minimize the environmental impact of large swine production units.

Journal of animal science·1999

Livestock producers face challenges with odor, dust, and flies. While advanced systems exist, careful site selection, facility design, management, and community relations remain the most effective strategies for odor control.

Area of Science:

  • Agricultural Science
  • Environmental Management
  • Animal Husbandry

Background:

  • Nuisance and odor control are significant challenges for livestock and poultry producers.
  • Odors, dust, and flies are primary concerns, impacting operations near sensitive areas.
  • Existing advanced control systems are often cost-prohibitive compared to standard lagoon basins.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness and economic viability of different nuisance and odor control strategies for livestock operations.
  • To identify the most successful approaches for mitigating odors, dust, and flies in agricultural settings.
  • To understand the factors influencing producer-neighbor relations regarding environmental nuisances.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing research and testing on various odor, dust, and fly control systems.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of cost-benefit comparisons between advanced systems and traditional lagoon holding basins.
  • Case study considerations of producer proximity to odor-sensitive sites and community tolerance.

    • Main Results:

    • Advanced systems can reduce odor, dust, and fly intensity but incur higher building and operational costs.
    • Producers near sensitive areas face greater challenges and potential costs related to odor complaints.
    • Odor control additives (feed or manure applied) have shown limited success.
    • Effective nuisance control relies on a combination of strategic planning and community engagement.

    Conclusions:

    • While technological solutions for odor control exist, their high cost limits widespread adoption.
    • The most effective and economical approach to managing livestock nuisances involves meticulous planning and community outreach.
    • Proactive measures in site selection, facility design, management, and local relations are crucial for sustainable livestock production and avoiding conflict.