Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Motion blur and motion sharpening in the human visual system

S T Hammett1

  • 1Laboratoire de Psychologie Expérimentale, Université René Descartes (Paris V), France. shammett@psy.gla.ac.uk

Vision Research
|November 28, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The dynamics of velocity adaptation in human vision.

Current biology : CB·2000
Same author

The effects of surround contrast on contrast thresholds, perceived contrast and contrast discrimination.

Vision research·1998
Same author

Motion blur and motion sharpening: temporal smear and local contrast non-linearity.

Vision research·1998
Same author

Spatio-temporal vernier acuity.

Spatial vision·1998
Same author

Adaptation to motion of a second-order pattern: the motion aftereffect is not a general result.

Vision research·1997
Same author

Motion sharpening: evidence for the addition of high spatial frequencies to the effective neural image.

Vision research·1996

Motion sharpening, not motion blur, affects blur discrimination at higher speeds. Perceptual blur constancy reveals stable performance, challenging previous assumptions about visual motion processing.

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Motion processing
  • Image analysis

Background:

  • Blur discrimination thresholds are crucial for understanding visual acuity.
  • Previous research suggested motion blur degrades performance at higher speeds.
  • The role of motion sharpening in visual perception remains debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of motion sharpening on blur discrimination thresholds.
  • To differentiate the effects of physical versus perceived blur at varying speeds.
  • To re-evaluate the contribution of motion blur versus motion sharpening to performance decline.

Main Methods:

  • Measured blur discrimination thresholds for drifting edges.
  • Manipulated edge blur to be either physically constant or perceptually constant.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Tested performance across a range of speeds (up to 6.3 deg sec-1).

    • Main Results:

    • When physical blur was constant, discrimination thresholds increased with speed.
    • When perceived blur was constant, performance remained stable across speeds.
    • This suggests motion sharpening, not motion blur, impacts performance.

    Conclusions:

    • The deterioration of blur discrimination at higher speeds is likely caused by motion sharpening.
    • A model incorporating non-linear motion processing (sharpening) and finite integration time (smearing) explains the findings.
    • This challenges the notion that motion blur is the primary factor limiting performance.